Total
291487 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2009-0567 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2009-0300 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-2636. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-2636. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-2636 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2009-0242 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: gmetad in Ganglia 3.1.1, when supporting multiple requests per connection on an interactive port, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a request to the gmetad service with a path that does not exist, which causes Ganglia to (1) perform excessive CPU computation and (2) send the entire tree, which consumes network bandwidth. NOTE: the vendor and original researcher have disputed this issue, since legitimate requests can generate the same amount of resource consumption. CVE concurs with the dispute, so this identifier should not be used | |||||
| CVE-2009-0236 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2009-0190 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1016. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2009-1016. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1016 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2009-0189 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1012. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2009-1012. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1012 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2009-0101 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2009-0092 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2009-0074 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2009-0073 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2008-7308 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2008-7307 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2008-7306 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2008-7305 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2008-7304 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2008-7260 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: This candidate is unused by its CNA. | |||||
| CVE-2008-7259 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: This candidate is unused by its CNA. | |||||
| CVE-2008-6800 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is not a security issue. It was originally created based on one vendor's misinterpretation of an upstream changelog comment that referred to a race condition in the winbind daemon (aka winbindd) in Samba before 3.0.32. The upstream vendor states: "The Samba Team sees no way to exploit this race condition by a user of the system or an external attacker. In order to be able to trigger the race condition a privileged user (root) need to intentionally kill a winbind child process and carefully time the killing to trigger the race condition. Although, if the user is already privileged, it can more easily just kill the parent process directly." CVE concurs with the dispute. Notes: CVE users should not use this identifier | |||||
| CVE-2008-6628 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-6268. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-6268. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-6268 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2008-6432 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6432. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6432. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6432 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||