Total
291487 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2009-2086 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1900. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1900. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1900 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2009-1927 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2009-1921 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2009-1871 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2009-1676 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1535. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1535. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1535 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2009-1563 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-0689. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-0689. Certain codebase relationships were not originally clear. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-0689 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2009-1543 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2009-1541 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2009-1540 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2009-1205 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4475. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-4475. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4475 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2009-1193 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2009-1153 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2009-0907 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1899. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1899. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1899 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2009-0797 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2009-0795 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-0796, CVE-2009-1265. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue, but a typo caused it to be associated with a different issue. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2009-0796 and CVE-2009-1265 to determine which ID is appropriate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2009-0786 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This was originally intended for a report about TCP Wrappers and the hosts_ctl API function, but further investigation showed that this was documented behavior by that function. Notes: Future CVE identifiers might be assigned to applications that mis-use the API in a security-relevant fashion. | |||||
| CVE-2009-0785 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2009. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2009-0782 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2009-0671 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: Format string vulnerability in the University of Washington (UW) c-client library, as used by the UW IMAP toolkit imap-2007d and other applications, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via format string specifiers in the initial request to the IMAP port (143/tcp). NOTE: Red Hat has disputed the vulnerability, stating "The Red Hat Security Response Team have been unable to confirm the existence of this format string vulnerability in the toolkit, and the sample published exploit is not complete or functional." CVE agrees that the exploit contains syntax errors and uses Unix-only include files while invoking Windows functions | |||||
| CVE-2009-0589 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | |||||