Total
291487 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2010-1430 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2010. Notes: none | |||||
CVE-2010-1154 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2010. Notes: none | |||||
CVE-2010-1145 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-4498. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-4498. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-4498 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2010-1144 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-0751, CVE-2010-1277. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue, but it was accidentally assigned to two different issues, one for libnids and another for Zabbix. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2010-0751 (libnids) and CVE-2010-1277 (Zabbix) to determine which ID is appropriate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2010-0813 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | |||||
CVE-2010-0809 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | |||||
CVE-2010-0771 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-3552. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2010-3552. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-3552 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2010-0735 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-0969. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-0969. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-0969 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2010-0499 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: This candidate is unused by its CNA. | |||||
CVE-2010-0495 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | |||||
CVE-2010-0493 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | |||||
CVE-2010-0413 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |||||
CVE-2010-0259 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | |||||
CVE-2010-0253 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | |||||
CVE-2010-0251 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | |||||
CVE-2010-0200 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1241. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1241. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1241 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2010-0099 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-0092. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-0092. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-0092 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2010-0061 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: This candidate is unused by its CNA. | |||||
CVE-2009-5146 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | |||||
CVE-2009-5108 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none |