Total
316927 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-3217 | 1 Calamp | 6 Lmu 3030 Cdma, Lmu 3030 Cdma Firmware, Lmu 3030 Gsm and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.1 HIGH |
| CalAmp LMU 3030 series OBD-II CDMA and GSM devices has an SMS (text message) interface that can be deployed where no password is configured for this interface by the integrator / reseller. This interface must be password protected, otherwise, the attacker only needs to know the phone number of the device (via an IMSI Catcher, for example) to send administrative commands to the device. These commands can be used to provide ongoing, real-time access to the device and can configure parameters such as IP addresses, firewall rules, and passwords. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3211 | 1 Yopify | 1 Yopify | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Yopify, an e-commerce notification plugin, up to April 06, 2017, leaks the first name, last initial, city, and recent purchase data of customers, all without user authorization. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3210 | 4 Fujitsu, Hp, Philips and 1 more | 6 Displayview Click, Displayview Click Suite, Display Assistant and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Applications developed using the Portrait Display SDK, versions 2.30 through 2.34, default to insecure configurations which allow arbitrary code execution. A number of applications developed using the Portrait Displays SDK do not use secure permissions when running. These applications run the component pdiservice.exe with NT AUTHORITY/SYSTEM permissions. This component is also read/writable by all Authenticated Users. This allows local authenticated attackers to run arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges. The following applications have been identified by Portrait Displays as affected: Fujitsu DisplayView Click: Version 6.0 and 6.01. The issue was fixed in Version 6.3. Fujitsu DisplayView Click Suite: Version 5. The issue is addressed by patch in Version 5.9. HP Display Assistant: Version 2.1. The issue was fixed in Version 2.11. HP My Display: Version 2.0. The issue was fixed in Version 2.1. Philips Smart Control Premium: Versions 2.23, 2.25. The issue was fixed in Version 2.26. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3209 | 2 Busybox, Dbpower | 3 Busybox, U818a, U818a Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 4.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| The DBPOWER U818A WIFI quadcopter drone provides FTP access over its own local access point, and allows full file permissions to the anonymous user. The DBPower U818A WIFI quadcopter drone runs an FTP server that by default allows anonymous access without a password, and provides full filesystem read/write permissions to the anonymous user. A remote user within range of the open access point on the drone may utilize the anonymous user of the FTP server to read arbitrary files, such as images and video recorded by the device, or to replace system files such as /etc/shadow to gain further access to the device. Furthermore, the DBPOWER U818A WIFI quadcopter drone uses BusyBox 1.20.2, which was released in 2012, and may be vulnerable to other known BusyBox vulnerabilities. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3208 | 1 Themidnightcoders | 1 Weborb For Java | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The Java implementation of AMF3 deserializers used by WebORB for Java by Midnight Coders, version 5.1.1.0, allows external entity references (XXEs) from XML documents embedded within AMF3 messages. If the XML parsing is handled incorrectly it could potentially expose sensitive data on the server, denial of service, or server side request forgery. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3207 | 1 Themidnightcoders | 1 Weborb For Java | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The Java implementations of AMF3 deserializers in WebORB for Java by Midnight Coders, version 5.1.1.0, derive class instances from java.io.Externalizable rather than the AMF3 specification's recommendation of flash.utils.IExternalizable. A remote attacker with the ability to spoof or control an RMI server connection may be able to send serialized Java objects that execute arbitrary code when deserialized. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3206 | 1 Exadel | 1 Flamingo | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The Java implementation of AMF3 deserializers used by Flamingo amf-serializer by Exadel, version 2.2.0, allows external entity references (XXEs) from XML documents embedded within AMF3 messages. If the XML parsing is handled incorrectly it could potentially expose sensitive data on the server, denial of service, or server side request forgery. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3203 | 1 Pivotal | 1 Spring-flex | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| The Java implementations of AMF3 deserializers in Pivotal/Spring Spring-flex derive class instances from java.io.Externalizable rather than the AMF3 specification's recommendation of flash.utils.IExternalizable. A remote attacker with the ability to spoof or control an RMI server connection may be able to send serialized Java objects that execute arbitrary code when deserialized. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3202 | 1 Exadel | 1 Flamingo | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The Java implementation of AMF3 deserializers used in Flamingo amf-serializer by Exadel, version 2.2.0, may allow instantiation of arbitrary classes via their public parameter-less constructor and subsequently call arbitrary Java Beans setter methods. The ability to exploit this vulnerability depends on the availability of classes in the class path that make use of deserialization. A remote attacker with the ability to spoof or control information may be able to send serialized Java objects with pre-set properties that result in arbitrary code execution when deserialized. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3201 | 1 Exadel | 1 Flamingo Amf-serializer | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| The Java implementation of AMF3 deserializers used in Flamingo amf-serializer by Exadel, version 2.2.0 derives class instances from java.io.Externalizable rather than the AMF3 specification's recommendation of flash.utils.IExternalizable. A remote attacker with the ability to spoof or control an RMI server connection may be able to send serialized Java objects that execute arbitrary code when deserialized. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3200 | 1 Graniteds | 1 Graniteds | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| The Java implementation of AMF3 deserializers used in GraniteDS, version 3.1.1.G, may allow instantiation of arbitrary classes via their public parameter-less constructor and subsequently call arbitrary Java Beans setter methods. The ability to exploit this vulnerability depends on the availability of classes in the class path that make use of deserialization. A remote attacker with the ability to spoof or control information may be able to send serialized Java objects with pre-set properties that result in arbitrary code execution when deserialized. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3199 | 1 Graniteds | 1 Graniteds | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| The Java implementation of GraniteDS, version 3.1.1.GA, AMF3 deserializers derives class instances from java.io.Externalizable rather than the AMF3 specification's recommendation of flash.utils.IExternalizable. A remote attacker with the ability to spoof or control an RMI server connection may be able to send serialized Java objects that execute arbitrary code when deserialized. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3198 | 1 Gigabyte | 4 Gb-bsi7h-6500, Gb-bsi7h-6500 Firmware, Gb-bxi7-5775 and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| GIGABYTE BRIX UEFI firmware does not cryptographically validate images prior to updating the system firmware. Additionally, the firmware updates are served over HTTP. An attacker can make arbitrary modifications to firmware images without being detected. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3197 | 1 Gigabyte | 4 Gb-bsi7h-6500, Gb-bsi7h-6500 Firmware, Gb-bxi7-5775 and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| GIGABYTE BRIX UEFI firmware for the GB-BSi7H-6500 (version F6) and GB-BXi7-5775 (version F2) platforms does not securely implement BIOSWE, BLE, SMM_BWP, and PRx features. As a result, the BIOS is not protected from arbitrary write access and may permit modifications to the SPI flash. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3189 | 1 Dotcms | 1 Dotcms | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.1 HIGH |
| The dotCMS administration panel, versions 3.7.1 and earlier, "Push Publishing" feature in Enterprise Pro is vulnerable to arbitrary file upload. When "Bundle" tar.gz archives uploaded to the Push Publishing feature are decompressed, there are no checks on the types of files which the bundle contains. This vulnerability combined with the path traversal vulnerability (CVE-2017-3188) can lead to remote command execution with the permissions of the user running the dotCMS application. An unauthenticated remote attacker may perform actions with the dotCMS administrator panel with the same permissions of a victim user or execute arbitrary system commands with the permissions of the user running the dotCMS application. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3188 | 1 Dotcms | 1 Dotcms | 2024-11-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The dotCMS administration panel, versions 3.7.1 and earlier, "Push Publishing" feature in Enterprise Pro is vulnerable to path traversal. When "Bundle" tar.gz archives uploaded to the Push Publishing feature are decompressed, the filenames of its contents are not properly checked, allowing for writing files to arbitrary directories on the file system. These archives may be uploaded directly via the administrator panel, or using the CSRF vulnerability (CVE-2017-3187). An unauthenticated remote attacker may perform actions with the dotCMS administrator panel with the same permissions of a victim user or execute arbitrary system commands with the permissions of the user running the dotCMS application. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3187 | 1 Dotcms | 1 Dotcms | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The dotCMS administration panel, versions 3.7.1 and earlier, are vulnerable to cross-site request forgery. The dotCMS administrator panel contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. An attacker can perform actions with the same permissions as a victim user, provided the victim has an active session and is induced to trigger the malicious request. An unauthenticated remote attacker may perform actions with the dotCMS administrator panel with the same permissions of a victim user or execute arbitrary system commands with the permissions of the user running the dotCMS application. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3183 | 1 Sage | 1 Xrt Treasury | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Sage XRT Treasury, version 3, fails to properly restrict database access to authorized users, which may enable any authenticated user to gain full access to privileged database functions. Sage XRT Treasury is a business finance management application. Database user access privileges are determined by the USER_CODE field associated with the querying user. By modifying the USER_CODE value to match that of a privileged user, a low-privileged, authenticated user may gain privileged access to the SQL database. A remote, authenticated user can submit specially crafted SQL queries to gain privileged access to the application database. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3182 | 1 Threatmetrix | 1 Threatmetrix Sdk | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| On the iOS platform, the ThreatMetrix SDK versions prior to 3.2 fail to validate SSL certificates provided by HTTPS connections, which may allow an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. ThreatMetrix is a security library for mobile applications, which aims to provide fraud prevention and device identity capabilities. The ThreatMetrix SDK versions prior to 3.2 do not validate SSL certificates on the iOS platform. An affected application will communicate with https://h-sdk.online-metrix.net, regardless of whether the connection is secure or not. An attacker on the same network as or upstream from the iOS device may be able to view or modify ThreatMetrix network traffic that should have been protected by HTTPS. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3181 | 1 Tibco | 7 Spotfire Analyst, Spotfire Client, Spotfire Connectors and 4 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Multiple TIBCO Products are prone to multiple unspecified SQL-injection vulnerabilities because it fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input before using it in an SQL query. Exploiting these issues could allow an attacker to compromise the application, access or modify data, or exploit latent vulnerabilities in the underlying database. The following products and versions are affected: TIBCO Spotfire Analyst 7.7.0 TIBCO Spotfire Connectors 7.6.0 TIBCO Spotfire Deployment Kit 7.7.0 TIBCO Spotfire Desktop 7.6.0 TIBCO Spotfire Desktop 7.7.0 TIBCO Spotfire Desktop Developer Edition 7.7.0 TIBCO Spotfire Desktop Language Packs 7.6.0 TIBCO Spotfire Desktop Language Packs 7.7.0 The following components are affected: TIBCO Spotfire Client TIBCO Spotfire Web Player Client | |||||