Filtered by vendor Microsoft
Subscribe
Total
20832 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-11620 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within ConvertToPDF_x86.dll. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5756. | |||||
| CVE-2018-11619 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.0.29935. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the setFocus method. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5417. | |||||
| CVE-2018-11618 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.0.29935. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the resetForm method. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5416. | |||||
| CVE-2018-11617 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.0.29935. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Format events for ComboBox fields. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5415. | |||||
| CVE-2018-10956 | 3 Ipconfigure, Linux, Microsoft | 3 Orchid Core Vms, Linux Kernel, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IPConfigure Orchid Core VMS 2.0.5 allows Directory Traversal. | |||||
| CVE-2018-10514 | 2 Microsoft, Trendmicro | 5 Windows, Antivirus \+ Security, Internet Security and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| A Missing Impersonation Privilege Escalation vulnerability in Trend Micro Security 2018 (Consumer) products could allow a local attacker to escalate privileges on vulnerable installations. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit the vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2018-10513 | 2 Microsoft, Trendmicro | 5 Windows, Antivirus \+ Security, Internet Security and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| A Deserialization of Untrusted Data Privilege Escalation vulnerability in Trend Micro Security 2018 (Consumer) products could allow a local attacker to escalate privileges on vulnerable installations. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit the vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2018-10512 | 2 Microsoft, Trendmicro | 2 Windows, Control Manager | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in Trend Micro Control Manager (versions 6.0 and 7.0) could allow an attacker to manipulate a reverse proxy .dll on vulnerable installations, which may lead to a denial of server (DoS). | |||||
| CVE-2018-10510 | 2 Microsoft, Trendmicro | 2 Windows, Control Manager | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A Directory Traversal Remote Code Execution vulnerability in Trend Micro Control Manager (versions 6.0 and 7.0) could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1000201 | 2 Microsoft, Ruby-ffi Project | 2 Windows, Ruby-ffi | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| ruby-ffi version 1.9.23 and earlier has a DLL loading issue which can be hijacked on Windows OS, when a Symbol is used as DLL name instead of a String This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in v1.9.24 and later. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1000117 | 2 Microsoft, Python | 2 Windows, Python | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| Python Software Foundation CPython version From 3.2 until 3.6.4 on Windows contains a Buffer Overflow vulnerability in os.symlink() function on Windows that can result in Arbitrary code execution, likely escalation of privilege. This attack appears to be exploitable via a python script that creates a symlink with an attacker controlled name or location. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 3.7.0 and 3.6.5. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1000006 | 2 Atom, Microsoft | 4 Electron, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| GitHub Electron versions 1.8.2-beta.3 and earlier, 1.7.10 and earlier, 1.6.15 and earlier has a vulnerability in the protocol handler, specifically Electron apps running on Windows 10, 7 or 2008 that register custom protocol handlers can be tricked in arbitrary command execution if the user clicks on a specially crafted URL. This has been fixed in versions 1.8.2-beta.4, 1.7.11, and 1.6.16. | |||||
| CVE-2018-0998 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Edge, Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| An information disclosure vulnerability exists when Microsoft Edge PDF Reader improperly handles objects in memory, aka "Microsoft Edge Information Disclosure Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0892. | |||||
| CVE-2018-0997 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Internet Explorer improperly accesses objects in memory, aka "Internet Explorer Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Internet Explorer 11. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0870, CVE-2018-0991, CVE-2018-1018, CVE-2018-1020. | |||||
| CVE-2018-0996 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Internet Explorer, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Internet Explorer 9, Internet Explorer 11, Internet Explorer 10. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0988, CVE-2018-1001. | |||||
| CVE-2018-0995 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Edge, Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2024-11-21 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka "Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge, ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0979, CVE-2018-0980, CVE-2018-0990, CVE-2018-0993, CVE-2018-0994, CVE-2018-1019. | |||||
| CVE-2018-0994 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Edge, Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2024-11-21 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka "Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge, ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0979, CVE-2018-0980, CVE-2018-0990, CVE-2018-0993, CVE-2018-0995, CVE-2018-1019. | |||||
| CVE-2018-0993 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Edge, Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2024-11-21 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka "Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge, ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0979, CVE-2018-0980, CVE-2018-0990, CVE-2018-0994, CVE-2018-0995, CVE-2018-1019. | |||||
| CVE-2018-0991 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Internet Explorer improperly accesses objects in memory, aka "Internet Explorer Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Internet Explorer 11, Internet Explorer 10. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0870, CVE-2018-0997, CVE-2018-1018, CVE-2018-1020. | |||||
| CVE-2018-0990 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Edge, Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2024-11-21 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka "Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge, ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0979, CVE-2018-0980, CVE-2018-0993, CVE-2018-0994, CVE-2018-0995, CVE-2018-1019. | |||||