Filtered by vendor Microsoft
Subscribe
Total
21808 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-13328 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 2 Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 9.5.0.20723. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of fields within Acroform objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8913. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13327 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 2 Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 9.5.0.20723. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of fields within Acroform objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8888. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13326 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 2 Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 9.5.0.20723. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of fields within Acroform objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8864. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13325 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 2 Foxit Studio Photo, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Studio Photo 3.6.6.909. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of EPS files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated structure. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8922. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13324 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 2 Foxit Studio Photo, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Studio Photo 3.6.6.909. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of TIFF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated structure. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8782. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13323 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 2 Foxit Studio Photo, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Studio Photo 3.6.6.909. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of TIF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated structure. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8783. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13320 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 9.5.0.20723. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of AcroForms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8814. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13319 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 9.5.0.20723. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of XFA forms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8669. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13318 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of Foxit Reader 9.5.0.20723. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of the util.printf Javascript method. The application processes the %p parameter in the format string, allowing heap addresses to be returned to the script. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8544. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13317 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote atackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.5.0.20723. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Calculate actions. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8759. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13316 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote atackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.5.0.20723. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Calculate actions. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8757. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13315 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote atackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 9.5.0.20723. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the removeField method. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8656. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13163 | 4 Fujitsu, Microsoft, Oracle and 1 more | 65 Celsius, Celsius Firmware, Gp7000f and 62 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The Fujitsu TLS library allows a man-in-the-middle attack. This affects Interstage Application Development Cycle Manager V10 and other versions, Interstage Application Server V12 and other versions, Interstage Business Application Manager V2 and other versions, Interstage Information Integrator V11 and other versions, Interstage Job Workload Server V8, Interstage List Works V10 and other versions, Interstage Studio V12 and other versions, Interstage Web Server Express V11, Linkexpress V5, Safeauthor V3, ServerView Resource Orchestrator V3, Systemwalker Cloud Business Service Management V1, Systemwalker Desktop Keeper V15, Systemwalker Desktop Patrol V15, Systemwalker IT Change Manager V14, Systemwalker Operation Manager V16 and other versions, Systemwalker Runbook Automation V15 and other versions, Systemwalker Security Control V1, and Systemwalker Software Configuration Manager V15. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13124 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 2 Foxit Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Foxit Reader 9.6.0.25114 and earlier has two unique RecursiveCall bugs involving 3 functions exhausting available stack memory because of Uncontrolled Recursion in the V8 JavaScript engine (issue 2 of 2). | |||||
| CVE-2019-13123 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 2 Foxit Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Foxit Reader 9.6.0.25114 and earlier has two unique RecursiveCall bugs involving 3 functions exhausting available stack memory because of Uncontrolled Recursion in the V8 JavaScript engine (issue 1 of 2). | |||||
| CVE-2019-12812 | 2 Activesoft, Microsoft | 2 Mybuilder, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| MyBuilder viewer before 6.2.2019.814 allow an attacker to execute arbitrary command via specifically crafted configuration file. This can be leveraged for code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2019-12811 | 2 Activesoft, Microsoft | 2 Mybuilder, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| ActiveX Control in MyBuilder before 6.2.2019.814 allow an attacker to execute arbitrary command via the ShellOpen method. This can be leveraged for code execution | |||||
| CVE-2019-12810 | 2 Estsoft, Microsoft | 2 Alsee, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| A memory corruption vulnerability exists in the .PSD parsing functionality of ALSee v5.3 ~ v8.39. A specially crafted .PSD file can cause an out of bounds write vulnerability resulting in code execution. By persuading a victim to open a specially-crafted .PSD file, an attacker could execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2019-12807 | 2 Estsoft, Microsoft | 2 Alzip, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Alzip 10.83 and earlier version contains a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability, caused by improper bounds checking during the parsing of crafted ISO archive file format. By persuading a victim to open a specially-crafted ISO archive file, an attacker could execution arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2019-12806 | 2 Crosscert, Microsoft | 2 Unisign, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| UniSign 2.0.4.0 and earlier version contains a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability which can overwrite the stack with arbitrary data, due to a buffer overflow in a library. That leads remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via crafted https packets. | |||||