Filtered by vendor Sophos
Subscribe
Total
160 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-6857 | 1 Sophos | 3 Safeguard Easy Device Encryption Client, Safeguard Enterprise Client, Safeguard Lan Crypt Client | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Sophos SafeGuard Enterprise before 8.00.5, SafeGuard Easy before 7.00.3, and SafeGuard LAN Crypt before 3.95.2 are vulnerable to Local Privilege Escalation via IOCTL 0x802022E0. By crafting an input buffer we can control the execution path to the point where the constant 0x12 will be written to a user-controlled address. We can take advantage of this condition to modify the SEP_TOKEN_PRIVILEGES structure of the Token object belonging to the exploit process and grant SE_DEBUG_NAME privilege. This allows the exploit process to interact with higher privileged processes running as SYSTEM and execute code in their security context. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6856 | 1 Sophos | 3 Safeguard Easy Device Encryption Client, Safeguard Enterprise Client, Safeguard Lan Crypt Client | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Sophos SafeGuard Enterprise before 8.00.5, SafeGuard Easy before 7.00.3, and SafeGuard LAN Crypt before 3.95.2 are vulnerable to Local Privilege Escalation via IOCTL 0x8020601C. By crafting an input buffer we can control the execution path to the point where a global variable will be written to a user controlled address. We can take advantage of this condition to zero-out the pointer to the security descriptor in the object header of a privileged process or modify the security descriptor itself and run code in the context of a process running as SYSTEM. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6855 | 1 Sophos | 3 Safeguard Easy Device Encryption Client, Safeguard Enterprise Client, Safeguard Lan Crypt Client | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Sophos SafeGuard Enterprise before 8.00.5, SafeGuard Easy before 7.00.3, and SafeGuard LAN Crypt before 3.95.2 are vulnerable to Local Privilege Escalation via IOCTL 0x80202014. By crafting an input buffer we can control the execution path to the point where the constant 0xFFFFFFF will be written to a user-controlled address. We can take advantage of this condition to modify the SEP_TOKEN_PRIVILEGES structure of the Token object belonging to the exploit process and grant SE_DEBUG_NAME privilege. This allows the exploit process to interact with higher privileged processes running as SYSTEM and execute code in their security context. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6854 | 1 Sophos | 3 Safeguard Easy Device Encryption Client, Safeguard Enterprise Client, Safeguard Lan Crypt Client | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Sophos SafeGuard Enterprise before 8.00.5, SafeGuard Easy before 7.00.3, and SafeGuard LAN Crypt before 3.95.2 are vulnerable to Local Privilege Escalation via multiple IOCTLs, e.g., 0x8810200B, 0x8810200F, 0x8810201B, 0x8810201F, 0x8810202B, 0x8810202F, 0x8810203F, 0x8810204B, 0x88102003, 0x88102007, 0x88102013, 0x88102017, 0x88102027, 0x88102033, 0x88102037, 0x88102043, and 0x88102047. When some conditions in the user-controlled input buffer are not met, the driver writes an error code (0x2000001A) to a user-controlled address. Also, note that all the aforementioned IOCTLs use transfer type METHOD_NEITHER, which means that the I/O manager does not validate any of the supplied pointers and buffer sizes. So, even though the driver checks for input/output buffer sizes, it doesn't validate if the pointers to those buffers are actually valid. So, we can supply a pointer for the output buffer to a kernel address space address, and the error code will be written there. We can take advantage of this condition to modify the SEP_TOKEN_PRIVILEGES structure of the Token object belonging to the exploit process and grant SE_DEBUG_NAME privilege. This allows the exploit process to interact with higher privileged processes running as SYSTEM and execute code in their security context. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6853 | 1 Sophos | 3 Safeguard Easy Device Encryption Client, Safeguard Enterprise Client, Safeguard Lan Crypt Client | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Sophos SafeGuard Enterprise before 8.00.5, SafeGuard Easy before 7.00.3, and SafeGuard LAN Crypt before 3.95.2 are vulnerable to Local Privilege Escalation via IOCTL 0x80206024. By crafting an input buffer we can control the execution path to the point where a global variable will be written to a user controlled address. We can take advantage of this condition to zero-out the pointer to the security descriptor in the object header of a privileged process or modify the security descriptor itself and run code in the context of a process running as SYSTEM. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6852 | 1 Sophos | 3 Safeguard Easy Device Encryption Client, Safeguard Enterprise Client, Safeguard Lan Crypt Client | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Sophos SafeGuard Enterprise before 8.00.5, SafeGuard Easy before 7.00.3, and SafeGuard LAN Crypt before 3.95.2 are vulnerable to Local Privilege Escalation via IOCTL 0x80202298. By crafting an input buffer we can control the execution path to the point where the nt!memset function is called to zero out contents of a user-controlled address. We can take advantage of this condition to zero-out the pointer to the security descriptor in the object header of a privileged process or modify the security descriptor itself and run code in the context of a process running as SYSTEM. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6851 | 1 Sophos | 3 Safeguard Easy Device Encryption Client, Safeguard Enterprise Client, Safeguard Lan Crypt Client | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Sophos SafeGuard Enterprise before 8.00.5, SafeGuard Easy before 7.00.3, and SafeGuard LAN Crypt before 3.95.2 are vulnerable to Local Privilege Escalation via IOCTL 0x80206040. By crafting an input buffer we can control the execution path to the point where the constant DWORD 0 will be written to a user-controlled address. We can take advantage of this condition to zero-out the pointer to the security descriptor in the object header of a privileged process or modify the security descriptor itself and run code in the context of a process running as SYSTEM. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6319 | 1 Sophos | 1 Sophos Tester | 2024-11-21 | 4.9 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In Sophos Tester Tool 3.2.0.7 Beta, the driver accepts a special DeviceIoControl code that doesn't check its argument. This argument is a memory address: if a caller passes a NULL pointer or a random invalid address, the driver will cause a Blue Screen of Death. If a program or malware does this at boot time, it can cause a persistent denial of service on the machine. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6318 | 1 Sophos | 1 Sophos Tester | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| In Sophos Tester Tool 3.2.0.7 Beta, the driver loads (in the context of the application used to test an exploit or ransomware) the DLL using a payload that runs from NTDLL.DLL (so, it's run in userland), but the driver doesn't perform any validation of this DLL (not its signature, not its hash, etc.). A person can change this DLL in a local way, or with a remote connection, to a malicious DLL with the same name -- and when the product is used, this malicious DLL will be loaded, aka a DLL Hijacking attack. | |||||
| CVE-2018-4863 | 1 Sophos | 1 Endpoint Protection | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Sophos Endpoint Protection 10.7 allows local users to bypass an intended tamper protection mechanism by deleting the HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\services\Sophos Endpoint Defense\ registry key. | |||||
| CVE-2018-3971 | 1 Sophos | 1 Hitmanpro.alert | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| An exploitable arbitrary write vulnerability exists in the 0x2222CC IOCTL handler functionality of Sophos HitmanPro.Alert 3.7.6.744. A specially crafted IRP request can cause the driver to write data under controlled by an attacker address, resulting in memory corruption. An attacker can send IRP request to trigger this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2018-3970 | 1 Sophos | 1 Hitmanpro.alert | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| An exploitable memory disclosure vulnerability exists in the 0x222000 IOCTL handler functionality of Sophos HitmanPro.Alert 3.7.6.744. A specially crafted IRP request can cause the driver to return uninitialized memory, resulting in kernel memory disclosure. An attacker can send an IRP request to trigger this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2018-16118 | 1 Sophos | 2 Sfos, Xg Firewall | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.1 HIGH |
| A shell escape vulnerability in /webconsole/APIController in the API Configuration component of Sophos XG firewall 17.0.8 MR-8 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via shell metachracters in the "X-Forwarded-for" HTTP header. | |||||
| CVE-2018-16117 | 1 Sophos | 2 Sfos, Xg Firewall | 2024-11-21 | 9.0 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| A shell escape vulnerability in /webconsole/Controller in Admin Portal of Sophos XG firewall 17.0.8 MR-8 allow remote authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via shell metacharacters in the "dbName" POST parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2018-16116 | 1 Sophos | 2 Sfos, Xg Firewall | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| SQL injection vulnerability in AccountStatus.jsp in Admin Portal of Sophos XG firewall 17.0.8 MR-8 allow remote authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the "username" GET parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2017-18014 | 1 Sophos | 2 Sfos, Xg Firewall | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| An NC-25986 issue was discovered in the Logging subsystem of Sophos XG Firewall with SFOS before 17.0.3 MR3. An unauthenticated user can trigger a persistent XSS vulnerability found in the WAF log page (Control Center -> Log Viewer -> in the filter option "Web Server Protection") in the webadmin interface, and execute any action available to the webadmin of the firewall (e.g., creating a new user, enabling SSH, or adding an SSH authorized key). The WAF log page will execute the "User-Agent" parameter in the HTTP POST request. | |||||
| CVE-2017-17023 | 2 Ncp-e, Sophos | 2 Ncp Secure Entry Client, Ipsec Client | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.1 HIGH |
| The Sophos UTM VPN endpoint interacts with client software provided by NPC Engineering (www.ncp-e.com). The affected client software, "Sophos IPSec Client" 11.04 is a rebranded version of NCP "Secure Entry Client" 10.11 r32792. A vulnerability in the software update feature of the VPN client allows a man-in-the-middle (MITM) or man-on-the-side (MOTS) attacker to execute arbitrary, malicious software on a target user's computer. This is related to SIC_V11.04-64.exe (Sophos), NCP_EntryCl_Windows_x86_1004_31799.exe (NCP), and ncpmon.exe (both Sophos and NCP). The vulnerability exists because: (1) the VPN client requests update metadata over an insecure HTTP connection; and (2) the client software does not check if the software update is signed before running it. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9038 | 1 Sophos | 1 Invincea-x | 2024-11-21 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| An exploitable double fetch vulnerability exists in the SboxDrv.sys driver functionality of Invincea-X 6.1.3-24058. A specially crafted input buffer and race condition can result in kernel memory corruption, which could result in privilege escalation. An attacker needs to execute a special application locally to trigger this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8732 | 1 Sophos | 1 Invincea Dell Protected Workspace | 2024-11-21 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Multiple security flaws exists in InvProtectDrv.sys which is a part of Invincea Dell Protected Workspace 5.1.1-22303. Weak restrictions on the driver communication channel and additional insufficient checks allow any application to turn off some of the protection mechanisms provided by the Invincea product. | |||||
| CVE-2016-6217 | 2 Linux, Sophos | 2 Linux Kernel, Puremessage | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Sophos PureMessage for UNIX before 6.3.2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. | |||||