Filtered by vendor Checkpoint
Subscribe
Total
130 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2005-3673 | 1 Checkpoint | 5 Check Point, Express, Firewall-1 and 2 more | 2025-04-03 | 7.8 HIGH | N/A |
| The Internet Key Exchange version 1 (IKEv1) implementation in Check Point products allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via certain crafted IKE packets, as demonstrated by the PROTOS ISAKMP Test Suite for IKEv1. NOTE: due to the lack of details in the advisory, it is unclear which of CVE-2005-3666, CVE-2005-3667, and/or CVE-2005-3668 this issue applies to. | |||||
| CVE-2000-0150 | 2 Checkpoint, Cisco | 2 Firewall-1, Pix Firewall Software | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Check Point Firewall-1 allows remote attackers to bypass port access restrictions on an FTP server by forcing it to send malicious packets that Firewall-1 misinterprets as a valid 227 response to a client's PASV attempt. | |||||
| CVE-2002-1623 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Vpn-1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The design of the Internet Key Exchange (IKE) protocol, when using Aggressive Mode for shared secret authentication, does not encrypt initiator or responder identities during negotiation, which may allow remote attackers to determine valid usernames by (1) monitoring responses before the password is supplied or (2) sniffing, as originally reported for FireWall-1 SecuRemote. | |||||
| CVE-2001-0082 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 SP2 with Fastmode enabled allows remote attackers to bypass access restrictions via malformed, fragmented packets. | |||||
| CVE-2001-1171 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 7.2 HIGH | N/A |
| Check Point Firewall-1 3.0b through 4.0 SP1 follows symlinks and creates a world-writable temporary .cpp file when compiling Policy rules, which could allow local users to gain privileges or modify the firewall policy. | |||||
| CVE-2000-0804 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to bypass the directionality check via fragmented TCP connection requests or reopening closed TCP connection requests, aka "One-way Connection Enforcement Bypass." | |||||
| CVE-2005-4093 | 1 Checkpoint | 2 Secureclient Ng, Vpn-1 Secureclient | 2025-04-03 | 6.5 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Check Point VPN-1 SecureClient NG with Application Intelligence R56, NG FP1, 4.0, and 4.1 allows remote attackers to bypass security policies by modifying the local copy of the local.scv policy file after it has been downloaded from the VPN Endpoint. | |||||
| CVE-2001-0182 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| FireWall-1 4.1 with a limited-IP license allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by sending a large number of spoofed IP packets with various source addresses to the inside interface, which floods the console with warning messages and consumes CPU resources. | |||||
| CVE-2001-1102 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 6.2 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Check Point FireWall-1 3.0b through 4.1 for Solaris allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on temporary policy files that end in a .cpp extension, which are set world-writable. | |||||
| CVE-2002-2405 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 4.9 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Check Point FireWall-1 4.1 and Next Generation (NG), with UserAuth configured to proxy HTTP traffic only, allows remote attackers to pass unauthorized HTTPS, FTP and possibly other traffic through the firewall. | |||||
| CVE-2000-0805 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 and earlier improperly retransmits encapsulated FWS packets, even if they do not come from a valid FWZ client, aka "Retransmission of Encapsulated Packets." | |||||
| CVE-2001-1303 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The default configuration of SecuRemote for Check Point Firewall-1 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive configuration information for the protected network without authentication. | |||||
| CVE-1999-0895 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Firewall-1 does not properly restrict access to LDAP attributes. | |||||
| CVE-2000-0808 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| The seed generation mechanism in the inter-module S/Key authentication mechanism in Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a brute force attack, aka "One-time (s/key) Password Authentication." | |||||
| CVE-2000-0779 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Checkpoint Firewall-1 with the RSH/REXEC setting enabled allows remote attackers to bypass access restrictions and connect to a RSH/REXEC client via malformed connection requests. | |||||
| CVE-2000-0582 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Check Point FireWall-1 4.0 and 4.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by sending a stream of invalid commands (such as binary zeros) to the SMTP Security Server proxy. | |||||
| CVE-2023-28134 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Endpoint Security | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Local attacker can escalate privileges on affected installations of Check Point Harmony Endpoint/ZoneAlarm Extreme Security. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2023-28133 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Endpoint Security | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Local privilege escalation in Check Point Endpoint Security Client (version E87.30) via crafted OpenSSL configuration file | |||||
| CVE-2023-28130 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Gaia Portal | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| Local user may lead to privilege escalation using Gaia Portal hostnames page. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23745 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Capsule Workspace | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A potential memory corruption issue was found in Capsule Workspace Android app (running on GrapheneOS). This could result in application crashing but could not be used to gather any sensitive information. | |||||