Filtered by vendor F5
Subscribe
Total
950 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-12207 | 8 Canonical, Debian, F5 and 5 more | 1533 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Big-ip Access Policy Manager and 1530 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.9 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Improper invalidation for page table updates by a virtual guest operating system for multiple Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable denial of service of the host system via local access. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6169 | 1 F5 | 1 Big-ip Policy Enforcement Manager | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| In versions 13.0.0, 12.0.0-12.1.3, or 11.6.0-11.6.2, an F5 BIG-IP virtual server using the URL categorization feature may cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to produce a core file when it receives malformed URLs during categorization. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6158 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In F5 BIG-IP 12.0.0-12.1.2, 11.6.0-11.6.1, 11.5.1-11.5.5, or 11.2.1 there is a vulnerability in TMM related to handling of invalid IP addresses. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6156 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 6.4 MEDIUM |
| When the F5 BIG-IP 12.1.0-12.1.1, 11.6.0-11.6.1, 11.5.1-11.5.5, or 11.2.1 system is configured with a wildcard IPSec tunnel endpoint, it may allow a remote attacker to disrupt or impersonate the tunnels that have completed phase 1 IPSec negotiations. The attacker must possess the necessary credentials to negotiate the phase 1 of the IPSec exchange to exploit this vulnerability; in many environment this limits the attack surface to other endpoints under the same administration. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6155 | 1 F5 | 11 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Application Acceleration Manager and 8 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| On F5 BIG-IP 13.0.0, 12.0.0-12.1.3.1, 11.6.0-11.6.2, 11.4.1-11.5.5, or 11.2.1, malformed SPDY or HTTP/2 requests may result in a disruption of service to TMM. Data plane is only exposed when a SPDY or HTTP/2 profile is attached to a virtual server. There is no control plane exposure. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6154 | 1 F5 | 1 Big-ip Application Security Manager | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| On F5 BIG-IP systems running 13.0.0, 12.1.0 - 12.1.3.1, or 11.6.1 - 11.6.2, the BIG-IP ASM bd daemon may core dump memory under some circumstances when processing undisclosed types of data on systems with 48 or more CPU cores. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6153 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Features in F5 BIG-IP 13.0.0-13.1.0.3, 12.1.0-12.1.3.1, 11.6.1-11.6.3.1, 11.5.1-11.5.5, or 11.2.1 system that utilizes inflate functionality directly, via an iRule, or via the inflate code from PEM module are subjected to a service disruption via a "Zip Bomb" attack. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6152 | 1 F5 | 1 Big-iq Centralized Management | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| A local user on F5 BIG-IQ Centralized Management 5.1.0-5.2.0 with the Access Manager role has privileges to change the passwords of other users on the system, including the local admin account password. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6150 | 1 F5 | 10 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Under certain conditions for F5 BIG-IP systems 13.0.0 or 12.1.0 - 12.1.3.1, using FastL4 profiles, when the Reassemble IP Fragments option is disabled (default), some specific large fragmented packets may restart the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM). | |||||
| CVE-2017-6148 | 1 F5 | 8 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Application Acceleration Manager and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Responses to SOCKS proxy requests made through F5 BIG-IP version 13.0.0, 12.0.0-12.1.3.1, 11.6.1-11.6.2, or 11.5.1-11.5.5 may cause a disruption of services provided by TMM. The data plane is impacted and exposed only when a SOCKS proxy profile is attached to a Virtual Server. The control plane is not impacted by this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6143 | 1 F5 | 2 Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Application Security Manager | 2024-11-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| X509 certificate verification was not correctly implemented in the IP Intelligence Subscription and IP Intelligence feed-list features, and thus the remote server's identity is not properly validated in F5 BIG-IP 12.0.0-12.1.2, 11.6.0-11.6.2, or 11.5.0-11.5.5. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6142 | 1 F5 | 1 Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager | 2024-11-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| X509 certificate verification was not correctly implemented in the early access "user id" feature in the F5 BIG-IP Advanced Firewall Manager versions 13.0.0, 12.1.0-12.1.2, and 11.6.0-11.6.2, and thus did not properly validate the remote server's identity on certain versions of BIG-IP. | |||||
| CVE-2017-20005 | 2 Debian, F5 | 2 Debian Linux, Nginx | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| NGINX before 1.13.6 has a buffer overflow for years that exceed four digits, as demonstrated by a file with a modification date in 1969 that causes an integer overflow (or a false modification date far in the future), when encountered by the autoindex module. | |||||
| CVE-2016-7475 | 1 F5 | 8 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Application Acceleration Manager and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Under some circumstances on BIG-IP 12.0.0-12.1.0, 11.6.0-11.6.1, or 11.4.0-11.5.4 HF1, the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) may not properly clean-up pool member network connections when using SPDY or HTTP/2 virtual server profiles. | |||||
| CVE-2016-7472 | 1 F5 | 1 Big-ip Application Security Manager | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| F5 BIG-IP ASM version 12.1.0 - 12.1.1 may allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (DoS) via a crafted HTTP request. | |||||
| CVE-2016-5236 | 1 F5 | 1 Websafe Alert Server | 2024-11-21 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Cross-Site-Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in F5 WebSafe Dashboard 3.9.5 and earlier, aka F5 WebSafe Alert Server, allow privileged authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML when creating a new user, account or signature. | |||||
| CVE-2016-5235 | 1 F5 | 1 Websafe Alert Server | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| A Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in versions of F5 WebSafe Dashboard 3.9.x and earlier, aka F5 WebSafe Alert Server, allows an unauthenticated user to inject HTML via a crafted alert. | |||||
| CVE-2014-5209 | 2 F5, Ntp | 25 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 22 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| An Information Disclosure vulnerability exists in NTP 4.2.7p25 private (mode 6/7) messages via a GET_RESTRICT control message, which could let a malicious user obtain sensitive information. | |||||
| CVE-2014-4024 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| SSL virtual servers in F5 BIG-IP systems 10.x before 10.2.4 HF9, 11.x before 11.2.1 HF12, 11.3.0 before HF10, 11.4.0 before HF8, 11.4.1 before HF5, 11.5.0 before HF5, and 11.5.1 before HF5, when used with third-party Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) accelerator cards, might allow remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a timing side-channel attack. | |||||
| CVE-2013-3587 | 1 F5 | 14 Arx, Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager and 11 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The HTTPS protocol, as used in unspecified web applications, can encrypt compressed data without properly obfuscating the length of the unencrypted data, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain plaintext secret values by observing length differences during a series of guesses in which a string in an HTTP request URL potentially matches an unknown string in an HTTP response body, aka a "BREACH" attack, a different issue than CVE-2012-4929. | |||||