Filtered by vendor Google
Subscribe
Total
13150 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-32324 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In onCommand of ActivityManagerShellCommand.java, there is a possible arbitrary activity launch due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32325 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In appendFrom of Parcel.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32326 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In multiple functions of AppRestrictionsFragment.java, there is a possible way to bypass intent security check due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32327 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In multiple functions of PickerDbFacade.java, there is a possible unauthorized data access due to SQL injection. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32330 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 5.7 MEDIUM |
| In generateRandomPassword of LocalBluetoothLeBroadcast.java, there is a possible way to intercept the Auracast audio stream due to an insecure default value. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32331 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In showDismissibleKeyguard of KeyguardService.java, there is a possible way to bypass app pinning due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32332 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible memory corruption due to a use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32333 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In startSpaActivityForApp of SpaActivity.kt, there is a possible cross-user permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32346 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In onActivityResult of VoicemailSettingsActivity.java, there is a possible work profile contact number leak due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32347 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In onStart of BiometricEnrollIntroduction.java, there is a possible way to determine the device's location due to an unsafe PendingIntent. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32349 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible privilege escalation due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32350 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In maybeShowDialog of ControlsSettingsDialogManager.kt, there is a possible overlay of the ControlsSettingsDialog due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48524 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In isSystem of WifiPermissionsUtil.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48560 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In AndroidManifest.xml, there is a possible way for an app to monitor motion events due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48563 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In onNullBinding of RemoteFillService.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to an insecure default value. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48581 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In VerifyNoOverlapInSessions of apexd.cpp, there is a possible way to block security updates through mainline installations due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2024-40664 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 6.2 MEDIUM |
| In setupAccessibilityServices of AccessibilityFragment.java , there is a possible way to hide an enabled accessibility service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-4600 | 1 Google | 1 Application Load Balancer | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A request smuggling vulnerability existed in the Google Cloud Classic Application Load Balancer due to improper handling of chunked-encoded HTTP requests. This allowed attackers to craft requests that could be misinterpreted by backend servers. The issue was fixed by disallowing stray data after a chunk, and is no longer exploitable. No action is required as Classic Application Load Balancer service after 2025-04-26 is not vulnerable. | |||||
| CVE-2025-2713 | 1 Google | 1 Gvisor | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Google gVisor's runsc component exhibited a local privilege escalation vulnerability due to incorrect handling of file access permissions, which allowed unprivileged users to access restricted files. This occurred because the process initially ran with root-like permissions until the first fork. | |||||
| CVE-2024-7254 | 2 Google, Netapp | 8 Protobuf, Protobuf-java, Protobuf-javalite and 5 more | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Any project that parses untrusted Protocol Buffers data containing an arbitrary number of nested groups / series of SGROUP tags can corrupted by exceeding the stack limit i.e. StackOverflow. Parsing nested groups as unknown fields with DiscardUnknownFieldsParser or Java Protobuf Lite parser, or against Protobuf map fields, creates unbounded recursions that can be abused by an attacker. | |||||