Filtered by vendor Gnu
Subscribe
Total
1079 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2004-0422 | 1 Gnu | 1 Flim | 2025-04-03 | 2.1 LOW | N/A |
flim before 1.14.3 creates temporary files insecurely, which allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files of the Emacs user via a symlink attack. | |||||
CVE-2005-1704 | 1 Gnu | 1 Gdb | 2025-04-03 | 4.6 MEDIUM | N/A |
Integer overflow in the Binary File Descriptor (BFD) library for gdb before 6.3, binutils, elfutils, and possibly other packages, allows user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted object file that specifies a large number of section headers, leading to a heap-based buffer overflow. | |||||
CVE-2006-1902 | 1 Gnu | 1 Gcc | 2025-04-03 | 2.1 LOW | N/A |
fold_binary in fold-const.c in GNU Compiler Collection (gcc) 4.1 improperly handles pointer overflow when folding a certain expr comparison to a corresponding offset comparison in cases other than EQ_EXPR and NE_EXPR, which might introduce buffer overflow vulnerabilities into applications that could be exploited by context-dependent attackers.NOTE: the vendor states that the essence of the issue is "not correctly interpreting an offset to a pointer as a signed value." | |||||
CVE-2003-0028 | 10 Cray, Freebsd, Gnu and 7 more | 13 Unicos, Freebsd, Glibc and 10 more | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
Integer overflow in the xdrmem_getbytes() function, and possibly other functions, of XDR (external data representation) libraries derived from SunRPC, including libnsl, libc, glibc, and dietlibc, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via certain integer values in length fields, a different vulnerability than CVE-2002-0391. | |||||
CVE-2006-1712 | 1 Gnu | 1 Mailman | 2025-04-03 | 2.6 LOW | N/A |
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the private archive script (private.py) in GNU Mailman 2.1.7 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the action argument. | |||||
CVE-2005-1520 | 1 Gnu | 1 Mailutils | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
Buffer overflow in the header_get_field_name function in header.c for GNU Mailutils 0.5 and 0.6, and other versions before 0.6.90, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted e-mail. | |||||
CVE-2004-1170 | 3 Gnu, Sun, Suse | 3 A2ps, Java Desktop System, Suse Linux | 2025-04-03 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
a2ps 4.13 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in the filename. | |||||
CVE-2004-1349 | 2 Gnu, Oracle | 2 Gzip, Solaris | 2025-04-03 | 2.1 LOW | N/A |
gzip before 1.3 in Solaris 8, when called with the -f or -force flags, will change the permissions of files that are hard linked to the target files, which allows local users to view or modify these files. | |||||
CVE-2001-0290 | 1 Gnu | 1 Mailman | 2025-04-03 | 4.6 MEDIUM | N/A |
Vulnerability in Mailman 2.0.1 and earlier allows list administrators to obtain user passwords. | |||||
CVE-2005-3425 | 1 Gnu | 1 Gnump3d | 2025-04-03 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in GNUMP3D before 2.9.6 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2005-3424. | |||||
CVE-2004-0966 | 2 Gnu, Ubuntu | 2 Gettext, Ubuntu Linux | 2025-04-03 | 2.1 LOW | N/A |
The (1) autopoint and (2) gettextize scripts in the GNU gettext package 1.14 and later versions, as used in Trustix Secure Linux 1.5 through 2.1 and other operating systems, allows local users to overwrite files via a symlink attack on temporary files. | |||||
CVE-1999-0035 | 2 Gnu, Sgi | 2 Inet, Irix | 2025-04-03 | 5.1 MEDIUM | N/A |
Race condition in signal handling routine in ftpd, allowing read/write arbitrary files. | |||||
CVE-2002-0399 | 1 Gnu | 1 Tar | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
Directory traversal vulnerability in GNU tar 1.13.19 through 1.13.25, and possibly later versions, allows attackers to overwrite arbitrary files during archive extraction via a (1) "/.." or (2) "./.." string, which removes the leading slash but leaves the "..", a variant of CVE-2001-1267. | |||||
CVE-2005-3137 | 1 Gnu | 1 Cfengine | 2025-04-03 | 2.1 LOW | N/A |
The (1) cfmailfilter and (2) cfcron.in files for cfengine 1.6.5 allow local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on temporary files, a different vulnerability than CVE-2005-2960. | |||||
CVE-2000-0271 | 1 Gnu | 1 Emacs | 2025-04-03 | 4.6 MEDIUM | N/A |
read-passwd and other Lisp functions in Emacs 20 do not properly clear the history of recently typed keys, which allows an attacker to read unencrypted passwords. | |||||
CVE-2005-2878 | 1 Gnu | 1 Mailutils | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
Format string vulnerability in search.c in the imap4d server in GNU Mailutils 0.6 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via format string specifiers in the SEARCH command. | |||||
CVE-2000-0270 | 1 Gnu | 1 Emacs | 2025-04-03 | 3.6 LOW | N/A |
The make-temp-name Lisp function in Emacs 20 creates temporary files with predictable names, which allows attackers to conduct a symlink attack. | |||||
CVE-2006-0049 | 1 Gnu | 1 Privacy Guard | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
gpg in GnuPG before 1.4.2.2 does not properly verify non-detached signatures, which allows attackers to inject unsigned data via a data packet that is not associated with a control packet, which causes the check for concatenated signatures to report that the signature is valid, a different vulnerability than CVE-2006-0455. | |||||
CVE-2005-0758 | 2 Canonical, Gnu | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Gzip | 2025-04-03 | 4.6 MEDIUM | N/A |
zgrep in gzip before 1.3.5 does not properly sanitize arguments, which allows local users to execute arbitrary commands via filenames that are injected into a sed script. | |||||
CVE-2006-0052 | 1 Gnu | 1 Mailman | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
The attachment scrubber (Scrubber.py) in Mailman 2.1.5 and earlier, when using Python's library email module 2.5, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (mailing list delivery failure) via a multipart MIME message with a single part that has two blank lines between the first boundary and the end boundary. |