Filtered by vendor Watchguard
Subscribe
Total
71 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2002-0528 | 1 Watchguard | 1 Soho Firewall | 2025-04-03 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Watchguard SOHO firewall 5.0.35 unpredictably disables certain IP restrictions for customized services that were set before the administrator upgrades to 5.0.35, which could allow remote attackers to bypass the intended access control rules. | |||||
| CVE-2001-0592 | 1 Watchguard | 1 Firebox Ii | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Watchguard Firebox II prior to 4.6 allows a remote attacker to create a denial of service in the kernel via a large stream (>10,000) of malformed ICMP or TCP packets. | |||||
| CVE-2000-0895 | 1 Watchguard | 1 Soho Firewall | 2025-04-03 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in HTTP server on the WatchGuard SOHO firewall allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via a long GET request. | |||||
| CVE-2002-1979 | 1 Watchguard | 3 Legacy Rssa, Soho, Vclass | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| WatchGuard SOHO products running firmware 5.1.6 and earlier, and Vclass/RSSA using 3.2 SP1 and earlier, allows remote attackers to bypass firewall rules by sending a PASV command string as the argument of another command to an FTP server, which generates a response that contains the string, causing IPFilter to treat the response as if it were a legitimate PASV command from the server. | |||||
| CVE-2002-0527 | 1 Watchguard | 1 Soho Firewall | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Watchguard SOHO firewall before 5.0.35 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and reboot) when SOHO forwards a packet with bad IP options. | |||||
| CVE-2001-0692 | 1 Watchguard | 2 Firebox 2500, Firebox 4500 | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| SMTP proxy in WatchGuard Firebox (2500 and 4500) 4.5 and 4.6 allows a remote attacker to bypass firewall filtering via a base64 MIME encoded email attachment whose boundary name ends in two dashes. | |||||
| CVE-2002-1046 | 1 Watchguard | 2 Firebox, Soho Firewall | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Dynamic VPN Configuration Protocol service (DVCP) in Watchguard Firebox firmware 5.x.x allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a malformed packet containing tab characters to TCP port 4110. | |||||
| CVE-2002-1519 | 2 Rapidstream, Watchguard | 2 Rapidstream, Firebox | 2025-04-03 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Format string vulnerability in the CLI interface for WatchGuard Firebox Vclass 3.2 and earlier, and RSSA Appliance 3.0.2, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via format string specifiers in the password parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2000-0894 | 1 Watchguard | 1 Soho Firewall | 2025-04-03 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| HTTP server on the WatchGuard SOHO firewall does not properly restrict access to administrative functions such as password resets or rebooting, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service or conduct unauthorized activities. | |||||
| CVE-2003-0642 | 1 Watchguard | 1 Serverlock | 2025-04-03 | 2.1 LOW | N/A |
| WatchGuard ServerLock for Windows 2000 before SL 2.0.4 allows local users to access kernel memory via a symlink attack on \Device\PhysicalMemory. | |||||
| CVE-2003-0641 | 1 Watchguard | 1 Serverlock | 2025-04-03 | 4.6 MEDIUM | N/A |
| WatchGuard ServerLock for Windows 2000 before SL 2.0.3 allows local users to load arbitrary modules via the OpenProcess() function, as demonstrated using (1) a DLL injection attack, (2) ZwSetSystemInformation, and (3) API hooking in OpenProcess. | |||||
| CVE-2001-0049 | 1 Watchguard | 1 Soho Firewall | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| WatchGuard SOHO FireWall 2.2.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a large number of GET requests. | |||||
| CVE-2001-0204 | 1 Watchguard | 1 Firebox Ii | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Watchguard Firebox II allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by establishing multiple connections and sending malformed PPTP packets. | |||||
| CVE-2002-1520 | 2 Rapidstream, Watchguard | 2 Rapidstream, Firebox | 2025-04-03 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| The CLI interface for WatchGuard Firebox Vclass 3.2 and earlier, and RSSA Appliance 3.0.2, does not properly close the SSH connection when a -N option is provided during authentication, which allows remote attackers to access CLI with administrator privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2000-0783 | 1 Watchguard | 1 Firebox | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Watchguard Firebox II allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by sending a malformed URL to the authentication service on port 4100. | |||||
| CVE-2000-0896 | 1 Watchguard | 1 Soho Firewall | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| WatchGuard SOHO firewall allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a flood of fragmented IP packets, which causes the firewall to drop connections and stop forwarding packets. | |||||
| CVE-2000-1182 | 1 Watchguard | 1 Firebox Ii | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| WatchGuard Firebox II allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by flooding the Firebox with a large number of FTP or SMTP requests, which disables proxy handling. | |||||
| CVE-2022-26318 | 1 Watchguard | 1 Fireware | 2025-03-14 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| On WatchGuard Firebox and XTM appliances, an unauthenticated user can execute arbitrary code, aka FBX-22786. This vulnerability impacts Fireware OS before 12.7.2_U2, 12.x before 12.1.3_U8, and 12.2.x through 12.5.x before 12.5.9_U2. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23176 | 1 Watchguard | 1 Fireware | 2025-03-14 | 9.0 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| WatchGuard Firebox and XTM appliances allow a remote attacker with unprivileged credentials to access the system with a privileged management session via exposed management access. This vulnerability impacts Fireware OS before 12.7.2_U1, 12.x before 12.1.3_U3, and 12.2.x through 12.5.x before 12.5.7_U3. | |||||
| CVE-2024-3661 | 9 Apple, Cisco, Citrix and 6 more | 12 Iphone Os, Macos, Anyconnect Vpn Client and 9 more | 2025-01-15 | N/A | 7.6 HIGH |
| DHCP can add routes to a client’s routing table via the classless static route option (121). VPN-based security solutions that rely on routes to redirect traffic can be forced to leak traffic over the physical interface. An attacker on the same local network can read, disrupt, or possibly modify network traffic that was expected to be protected by the VPN. | |||||