Filtered by vendor Pivotal
Subscribe
Total
30 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-19029 | 2 Linuxfoundation, Pivotal | 2 Harbor, Vmware Harbor Registry | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| Cloud Native Computing Foundation Harbor prior to 1.8.6 and 1.9.3 allows SQL Injection via user-groups in the VMware Harbor Container Registry for the Pivotal Platform. | |||||
| CVE-2019-19026 | 2 Linuxfoundation, Pivotal | 2 Harbor, Vmware Harbor Registry | 2024-11-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| Cloud Native Computing Foundation Harbor prior to 1.8.6 and 1.9.3 allows SQL Injection via project quotas in the VMware Harbor Container Registry for the Pivotal Platform. | |||||
| CVE-2019-19025 | 2 Linuxfoundation, Pivotal | 2 Harbor, Vmware Harbor Registry | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Cloud Native Computing Foundation Harbor prior to 1.8.6 and 1.9.3 allows CSRF in the VMware Harbor Container Registry for the Pivotal Platform. | |||||
| CVE-2019-19023 | 2 Linuxfoundation, Pivotal | 2 Harbor, Vmware Harbor Registry | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Cloud Native Computing Foundation Harbor prior to 1.8.6 and 1.9.3 has a Privilege Escalation Vulnerability in the VMware Harbor Container Registry for the Pivotal Platform. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11288 | 1 Pivotal | 2 Tc Runtimes, Tc Server | 2024-11-21 | 1.9 LOW | 7.0 HIGH |
| In Pivotal tc Server, 3.x versions prior to 3.2.19 and 4.x versions prior to 4.0.10, and Pivotal tc Runtimes, 7.x versions prior to 7.0.99.B, 8.x versions prior to 8.5.47.A, and 9.x versions prior to 9.0.27.A, when a tc Runtime instance is configured with the JMX Socket Listener, a local attacker without access to the tc Runtime process or configuration files is able to manipulate the RMI registry to perform a man-in-the-middle attack to capture user names and passwords used to access the JMX interface. The attacker can then use these credentials to access the JMX interface and gain complete control over the tc Runtime instance. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11284 | 1 Pivotal | 1 Reactor Netty | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 8.6 HIGH |
| Pivotal Reactor Netty, versions prior to 0.8.11, passes headers through redirects, including authorization ones. A remote unauthenticated malicious user may gain access to credentials for a different server than they have access to. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11275 | 2 Pivotal, Pivotal Software | 2 Apps Manager, Pivotal Application Service | 2024-11-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Pivotal Application Manager, versions 666.0.x prior to 666.0.36, versions 667.0.x prior to 667.0.22, versions 668.0.x prior to 668.0.21, versions 669.0.x prior to 669.0.13, and versions 670.0.x prior to 670.0.7, contain a vulnerability where a remote authenticated user can create an app with a name such that a csv program can interpret into a formula and gets executed. The malicious user can possibly gain access to a usage report that requires a higher privilege. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1223 | 1 Pivotal | 1 Cloud Foundry Container Runtime | 2024-11-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Cloud Foundry Container Runtime (kubo-release), versions prior to 0.14.0, may leak UAA and vCenter credentials to application logs. A malicious user with the ability to read the application logs could use these credentials to escalate privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1190 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal | 3 Cf-release, Uaa, Uaa Bosh | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in these Pivotal Cloud Foundry products: all versions prior to cf-release v270, UAA v3.x prior to v3.20.2, and UAA bosh v30.x versions prior to v30.8 and all other versions prior to v45.0. A cross-site scripting (XSS) attack is possible in the clientId parameter of a request to the UAA OpenID Connect check session iframe endpoint used for single logout session management. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3203 | 1 Pivotal | 1 Spring-flex | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| The Java implementations of AMF3 deserializers in Pivotal/Spring Spring-flex derive class instances from java.io.Externalizable rather than the AMF3 specification's recommendation of flash.utils.IExternalizable. A remote attacker with the ability to spoof or control an RMI server connection may be able to send serialized Java objects that execute arbitrary code when deserialized. | |||||