Total
303493 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2014-1306 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2014. Notes: none | |||||
CVE-2014-1288 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2014. Notes: none | |||||
CVE-2014-1284 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-2019. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-2019. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-2019 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2014-1283 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2014. Notes: none | |||||
CVE-2014-1277 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-3948. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-3948. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-3948 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2014-1155 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-9580. Reason: This candidate is not authorized for use because it is part of the 2014 CVE-ID ID-Syntax protection block, which protects against accidental truncation of CVE IDs with sequence numbers containing more than 4 digits. See references. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-9580 instead of this candidate | |||||
CVE-2014-1137 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-9445, CVE-2014-9581, CVE-2014-9582. Reason: This candidate is not authorized for use because it is part of the 2014 CVE-ID ID-Syntax protection block, which protects against accidental truncation of CVE IDs with sequence numbers containing more than 4 digits. See references. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-9445, CVE-2014-9581, or CVE-2014-9582 instead of this candidate | |||||
CVE-2014-1004 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-9456. Reason: This candidate is not authorized for use because it is part of the 2014 CVE-ID ID-Syntax protection block, which protects against accidental truncation of CVE IDs with sequence numbers containing more than 4 digits. See references. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-9456 instead of this candidate | |||||
CVE-2014-125064 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
CVE-2014-125043 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
CVE-2014-125042 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
CVE-2014-123456 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: This ID is frequently used as an example of the 2014 CVE-ID syntax change, which allows more than 4 digits in the sequence number. Notes: See references | |||||
CVE-2014-10061 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2014. Notes: none | |||||
CVE-2014-10060 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2014. Notes: none | |||||
CVE-2014-10049 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2014. Notes: none | |||||
CVE-2014-10000 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: This ID is frequently used as an example of the 2014 CVE-ID syntax change, which allows more than 4 digits in the sequence number. Notes: See references | |||||
CVE-2014-100000 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: This ID is frequently used as an example of the 2014 CVE-ID syntax change, which allows more than 4 digits in the sequence number. Notes: See references | |||||
CVE-2014-1000000 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. This CVE id is an example number in https://cve.mitre.org/cve/identifiers/syntaxchange.html. Notes: none | |||||
CVE-2014-0982 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-0981. Reason: This issue was MERGED into CVE-2014-0981 in accordance with CVE content decisions, because it is the same type of vulnerability and affects the same versions. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-0981 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2014-0788 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2014. Notes: none |