Total
32105 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-9471 | 1 Paloaltonetworks | 1 Pan-os | 2024-10-15 | N/A | 4.7 MEDIUM |
| A privilege escalation (PE) vulnerability in the XML API of Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS software enables an authenticated PAN-OS administrator with restricted privileges to use a compromised XML API key to perform actions as a higher privileged PAN-OS administrator. For example, an administrator with "Virtual system administrator (read-only)" access could use an XML API key of a "Virtual system administrator" to perform write operations on the virtual system configuration even though they should be limited to read-only operations. | |||||
| CVE-2024-46307 | 1 Sparkshop | 1 Sparkshop | 2024-10-15 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A loop hole in the payment logic of Sparkshop v1.16 allows attackers to arbitrarily modify the number of products. | |||||
| CVE-2024-7294 | 1 Progress | 1 Telerik Reporting | 2024-10-15 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In Progress® Telerik® Report Server versions prior to 2024 Q3 (10.2.24.806), an HTTP DoS attack is possible on anonymous endpoints without rate limiting. | |||||
| CVE-2024-9519 | 1 Wpuserplus | 1 Userplus | 2024-10-15 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| The UserPlus plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to an improper capability check on the 'save_metabox_form' function in versions up to, and including, 2.0. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with editor-level permissions or above, to update the registration form role to administrator, which leads to privilege escalation. | |||||
| CVE-2024-9518 | 1 Wpuserplus | 1 Userplus | 2024-10-15 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The UserPlus plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to privilege escalation in versions up to, and including, 2.0 due to insufficient restriction on the 'form_actions' and 'userplus_update_user_profile' functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to specify their user role by supplying the 'role' parameter during a registration. | |||||
| CVE-2024-45135 | 1 Adobe | 3 Commerce, Commerce B2b, Magento | 2024-10-11 | N/A | 2.7 LOW |
| Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p2, 2.4.6-p7, 2.4.5-p9, 2.4.4-p10 and earlier are affected by an Improper Access Control vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An admin attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and have a low impact on integrity. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | |||||
| CVE-2024-45134 | 1 Adobe | 3 Commerce, Commerce B2b, Magento | 2024-10-11 | N/A | 2.7 LOW |
| Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p2, 2.4.6-p7, 2.4.5-p9, 2.4.4-p10 and earlier are affected by an Information Exposure vulnerability that could result in a security feature bypass. An admin attacker could leverage this vulnerability to have a low impact on confidentiality which may aid in further attacks. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | |||||
| CVE-2024-45129 | 1 Adobe | 3 Commerce, Commerce B2b, Magento | 2024-10-11 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p2, 2.4.6-p7, 2.4.5-p9, 2.4.4-p10 and earlier are affected by an Improper Access Control vulnerability that could result in Privilege escalation. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and have a low impact on integrity. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | |||||
| CVE-2024-45130 | 1 Adobe | 3 Commerce, Commerce B2b, Magento | 2024-10-11 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p2, 2.4.6-p7, 2.4.5-p9, 2.4.4-p10 and earlier are affected by an Improper Access Control vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and have a low impact on integrity. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | |||||
| CVE-2024-45124 | 1 Adobe | 3 Commerce, Commerce B2b, Magento | 2024-10-11 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p2, 2.4.6-p7, 2.4.5-p9, 2.4.4-p10 and earlier are affected by an Improper Access Control vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and have a low impact on integrity. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | |||||
| CVE-2024-48942 | 1 Syracom | 1 Secure Login | 2024-10-11 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The Syracom Secure Login (2FA) plugin for Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket through 3.1.4.5 allows remote attackers to easily brute-force the 2FA PIN via the plugins/servlet/twofactor/public/pinvalidation endpoint. The last 30 and the next 30 tokens are valid. | |||||
| CVE-2024-48941 | 1 Syracom | 1 Secure Login | 2024-10-11 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| The Syracom Secure Login (2FA) plugin for Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket through 3.1.4.5 allows remote attackers to bypass 2FA by interacting with the /rest endpoint of Jira, Confluence, or Bitbucket. In the default configuration, /rest is allowlisted. | |||||
| CVE-2024-45115 | 1 Adobe | 3 Commerce, Commerce B2b, Magento | 2024-10-10 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p2, 2.4.6-p7, 2.4.5-p9, 2.4.4-p10 and earlier are affected by an Improper Authentication vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain unauthorized access or elevated privileges within the application. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | |||||
| CVE-2024-45117 | 1 Adobe | 3 Commerce, Commerce B2b, Magento | 2024-10-10 | N/A | 7.6 HIGH |
| Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p2, 2.4.6-p7, 2.4.5-p9, 2.4.4-p10 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read. An admin attacker could exploit this vulnerability to read files from the system outside of the intended directories via PHP filter chain and also can have a low-availability impact on the service. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction and scope is changed. | |||||
| CVE-2024-45118 | 1 Adobe | 3 Commerce, Commerce B2b, Magento | 2024-10-10 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p2, 2.4.6-p7, 2.4.5-p9, 2.4.4-p10 and earlier are affected by an Improper Access Control vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and have high impact on integrity. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | |||||
| CVE-2024-45121 | 1 Adobe | 3 Commerce, Commerce B2b, Magento | 2024-10-10 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p2, 2.4.6-p7, 2.4.5-p9, 2.4.4-p10 and earlier are affected by an Improper Access Control vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and have a low impact on integrity. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | |||||
| CVE-2024-45122 | 1 Adobe | 3 Commerce, Commerce B2b, Magento | 2024-10-10 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p2, 2.4.6-p7, 2.4.5-p9, 2.4.4-p10 and earlier are affected by an Improper Access Control vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and have a low impact on confidentiality. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | |||||
| CVE-2024-30118 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Connections | 2024-10-10 | N/A | 3.5 LOW |
| HCL Connections is vulnerable to an information disclosure vulnerability which could allow a user to obtain sensitive information they are not entitled to because of improperly handling the request data. | |||||
| CVE-2024-44958 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2024-10-10 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched/smt: Fix unbalance sched_smt_present dec/inc I got the following warn report while doing stress test: jump label: negative count! WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 38 at kernel/jump_label.c:263 static_key_slow_try_dec+0x9d/0xb0 Call Trace: <TASK> __static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked+0x16/0x70 sched_cpu_deactivate+0x26e/0x2a0 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x3ad/0x10d0 cpuhp_thread_fun+0x3f5/0x680 smpboot_thread_fn+0x56d/0x8d0 kthread+0x309/0x400 ret_from_fork+0x41/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK> Because when cpuset_cpu_inactive() fails in sched_cpu_deactivate(), the cpu offline failed, but sched_smt_present is decremented before calling sched_cpu_deactivate(), it leads to unbalanced dec/inc, so fix it by incrementing sched_smt_present in the error path. | |||||
| CVE-2024-44959 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2024-10-10 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tracefs: Use generic inode RCU for synchronizing freeing With structure layout randomization enabled for 'struct inode' we need to avoid overlapping any of the RCU-used / initialized-only-once members, e.g. i_lru or i_sb_list to not corrupt related list traversals when making use of the rcu_head. For an unlucky structure layout of 'struct inode' we may end up with the following splat when running the ftrace selftests: [<...>] list_del corruption, ffff888103ee2cb0->next (tracefs_inode_cache+0x0/0x4e0 [slab object]) is NULL (prev is tracefs_inode_cache+0x78/0x4e0 [slab object]) [<...>] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [<...>] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:54! [<...>] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN [<...>] CPU: 3 PID: 2550 Comm: mount Tainted: G N 6.8.12-grsec+ #122 ed2f536ca62f28b087b90e3cc906a8d25b3ddc65 [<...>] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014 [<...>] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff84656018>] __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x138/0x3e0 [<...>] Code: 48 b8 99 fb 65 f2 ff ff ff ff e9 03 5c d9 fc cc 48 b8 99 fb 65 f2 ff ff ff ff e9 33 5a d9 fc cc 48 b8 99 fb 65 f2 ff ff ff ff <0f> 0b 4c 89 e9 48 89 ea 48 89 ee 48 c7 c7 60 8f dd 89 31 c0 e8 2f [<...>] RSP: 0018:fffffe80416afaf0 EFLAGS: 00010283 [<...>] RAX: 0000000000000098 RBX: ffff888103ee2cb0 RCX: 0000000000000000 [<...>] RDX: ffffffff84655fe8 RSI: ffffffff89dd8b60 RDI: 0000000000000001 [<...>] RBP: ffff888103ee2cb0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: fffffbd0082d5f25 [<...>] R10: fffffe80416af92f R11: 0000000000000001 R12: fdf99c16731d9b6d [<...>] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff88819ad4b8b8 R15: 0000000000000000 [<...>] RBX: tracefs_inode_cache+0x0/0x4e0 [slab object] [<...>] RDX: __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x108/0x3e0 [<...>] RSI: __func__.47+0x4340/0x4400 [<...>] RBP: tracefs_inode_cache+0x0/0x4e0 [slab object] [<...>] RSP: process kstack fffffe80416afaf0+0x7af0/0x8000 [mount 2550 2550] [<...>] R09: kasan shadow of process kstack fffffe80416af928+0x7928/0x8000 [mount 2550 2550] [<...>] R10: process kstack fffffe80416af92f+0x792f/0x8000 [mount 2550 2550] [<...>] R14: tracefs_inode_cache+0x78/0x4e0 [slab object] [<...>] FS: 00006dcb380c1840(0000) GS:ffff8881e0600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [<...>] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [<...>] CR2: 000076ab72b30e84 CR3: 000000000b088004 CR4: 0000000000360ef0 shadow CR4: 0000000000360ef0 [<...>] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [<...>] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [<...>] ASID: 0003 [<...>] Stack: [<...>] ffffffff818a2315 00000000f5c856ee ffffffff896f1840 ffff888103ee2cb0 [<...>] ffff88812b6b9750 0000000079d714b6 fffffbfff1e9280b ffffffff8f49405f [<...>] 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 ffff888104457280 ffffffff8248b392 [<...>] Call Trace: [<...>] <TASK> [<...>] [<ffffffff818a2315>] ? lock_release+0x175/0x380 fffffe80416afaf0 [<...>] [<ffffffff8248b392>] list_lru_del+0x152/0x740 fffffe80416afb48 [<...>] [<ffffffff8248ba93>] list_lru_del_obj+0x113/0x280 fffffe80416afb88 [<...>] [<ffffffff8940fd19>] ? _atomic_dec_and_lock+0x119/0x200 fffffe80416afb90 [<...>] [<ffffffff8295b244>] iput_final+0x1c4/0x9a0 fffffe80416afbb8 [<...>] [<ffffffff8293a52b>] dentry_unlink_inode+0x44b/0xaa0 fffffe80416afbf8 [<...>] [<ffffffff8293fefc>] __dentry_kill+0x23c/0xf00 fffffe80416afc40 [<...>] [<ffffffff8953a85f>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x1f/0xa0 fffffe80416afc48 [<...>] [<ffffffff82949ce5>] ? shrink_dentry_list+0x1c5/0x760 fffffe80416afc70 [<...>] [<ffffffff82949b71>] ? shrink_dentry_list+0x51/0x760 fffffe80416afc78 [<...>] [<ffffffff82949da8>] shrink_dentry_list+0x288/0x760 fffffe80416afc80 [<...>] [<ffffffff8294ae75>] shrink_dcache_sb+0x155/0x420 fffffe80416afcc8 [<...>] [<ffffffff8953a7c3>] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0x23/0xa0 fffffe80416afce0 [<...>] [<ffffffff8294ad20>] ? do_one_tre ---truncated--- | |||||