Total
621 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-42105 | 1 Ashlar | 1 Cobalt | 2025-07-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Ashlar-Vellum Cobalt AR File Parsing Type Confusion Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Ashlar-Vellum Cobalt. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of AR files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. . Was ZDI-CAN-20562. | |||||
| CVE-2023-42102 | 1 Ashlar | 1 Cobalt | 2025-07-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Ashlar-Vellum Cobalt AR File Parsing Type Confusion Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Ashlar-Vellum Cobalt. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of AR files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. . Was ZDI-CAN-20409. | |||||
| CVE-2025-2015 | 1 Ashlar | 1 Cobalt | 2025-07-07 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Ashlar-Vellum Cobalt VS File Parsing Type Confusion Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Ashlar-Vellum Cobalt. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of VS files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-25236. | |||||
| CVE-2025-2016 | 1 Ashlar | 1 Cobalt | 2025-07-07 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Ashlar-Vellum Cobalt VC6 File Parsing Type Confusion Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Ashlar-Vellum Cobalt. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of VC6 files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-25238. | |||||
| CVE-2025-2018 | 1 Ashlar | 1 Cobalt | 2025-07-07 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Ashlar-Vellum Cobalt VS File Parsing Type Confusion Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Ashlar-Vellum Cobalt. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of VS files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-25245. | |||||
| CVE-2025-2022 | 1 Ashlar | 1 Cobalt | 2025-07-07 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Ashlar-Vellum Cobalt VS File Parsing Type Confusion Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Ashlar-Vellum Cobalt. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of VS files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-25276. | |||||
| CVE-2024-53427 | 1 Jqlang | 1 Jq | 2025-07-01 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| decNumberCopy in decNumber.c in jq through 1.7.1 does not properly consider that NaN is interpreted as numeric, which has a resultant stack-based buffer overflow and out-of-bounds write, as demonstrated by use of --slurp with subtraction, such as a filter of .-. when the input has a certain form of digit string with NaN (e.g., "1 NaN123" immediately followed by many more digits). | |||||
| CVE-2025-21356 | 1 Microsoft | 3 365 Apps, Office, Office Long Term Servicing Channel | 2025-07-01 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Microsoft Office Visio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2024-37603 | 1 Mercedes-benz | 1 Headunit Ntg6 Mercedes-benz User Experience | 2025-06-27 | N/A | 4.6 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Mercedes Benz NTG (New Telematics Generation) 6. A possible type confusion exists in the user data import/export function of NTG 6 head units. To perform this attack, local access to the USB interface of the car is needed. With prepared data, an attacker can cause the User-Data service to fail. The failed service instance will restart automatically. | |||||
| CVE-2024-49196 | 1 Samsung | 4 Exynos 1480, Exynos 1480 Firmware, Exynos 2400 and 1 more | 2025-06-20 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in the GPU in Samsung Mobile Processor Exynos 1480 and 2400. Type confusion leads to a Denial of Service. | |||||
| CVE-2023-41060 | 1 Apple | 3 Ipados, Iphone Os, Macos | 2025-06-20 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A type confusion issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Sonoma 14, iOS 17 and iPadOS 17. A remote user may be able to cause kernel code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2025-5959 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2025-06-16 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Type Confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 137.0.7151.103 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | |||||
| CVE-2025-20063 | 1 Openatom | 1 Openharmony | 2025-06-09 | N/A | 3.3 LOW |
| in OpenHarmony v5.0.3 and prior versions allow a local attacker cause apps crash through type confusion. | |||||
| CVE-2025-21082 | 1 Openatom | 1 Openharmony | 2025-06-09 | N/A | 3.3 LOW |
| in OpenHarmony v5.0.3 and prior versions allow a local attacker cause apps crash through type confusion. | |||||
| CVE-2024-23222 | 1 Apple | 4 Ipados, Iphone Os, Macos and 1 more | 2025-06-03 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A type confusion issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in iOS 17.3 and iPadOS 17.3, macOS Sonoma 14.3, tvOS 17.3. Processing maliciously crafted web content may lead to arbitrary code execution. Apple is aware of a report that this issue may have been exploited. | |||||
| CVE-2024-6119 | 2 Netapp, Openssl | 31 500f, 500f Firmware, A250 and 28 more | 2025-06-03 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Issue summary: Applications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS clients checking server certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory address resulting in abnormal termination of the application process. Impact summary: Abnormal termination of an application can a cause a denial of service. Applications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS clients checking server certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory address when comparing the expected name with an `otherName` subject alternative name of an X.509 certificate. This may result in an exception that terminates the application program. Note that basic certificate chain validation (signatures, dates, ...) is not affected, the denial of service can occur only when the application also specifies an expected DNS name, Email address or IP address. TLS servers rarely solicit client certificates, and even when they do, they generally don't perform a name check against a reference identifier (expected identity), but rather extract the presented identity after checking the certificate chain. So TLS servers are generally not affected and the severity of the issue is Moderate. The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2022-34709 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Windows 10, Windows 11, Windows Server 2016 and 2 more | 2025-05-29 | N/A | 6.0 MEDIUM |
| Windows Defender Credential Guard Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2025-30397 | 1 Microsoft | 15 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 12 more | 2025-05-29 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in Microsoft Scripting Engine allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | |||||
| CVE-2024-20078 | 2 Google, Mediatek | 21 Android, Mt6768, Mt6779 and 18 more | 2025-05-28 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In venc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to type confusion. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS08737250; Issue ID: MSV-1452. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48756 | 2025-05-28 | N/A | 2.9 LOW | ||
| In group_number in the scsir crate 0.2.0 for Rust, there can be an overflow because a hardware device may expect a small number of bits (e.g., 5 bits) for group number. | |||||