Total
9 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-33026 | 1 Peazip | 1 Peazip | 2025-04-22 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| In PeaZip through 10.4.0, there is a Mark-of-the-Web Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows attackers to bypass the Mark-of-the-Web protection mechanism on affected installations of PeaZip. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of archived files. When extracting files from a crafted archive that bears the Mark-of-the-Web, PeaZip does not propagate the Mark-of-the-Web to the extracted files. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. | |||||
| CVE-2025-43703 | 2025-04-17 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
| An issue was discovered in Ankitects Anki through 25.02. A crafted shared deck can result in attacker-controlled access to the internal API (even though the attacker has no knowledge of an API key) through approaches such as scripts or the SRC attribute of an IMG element. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2024-32484. | |||||
| CVE-2025-33027 | 2025-04-15 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
| In Bandisoft Bandizip through 7.37, there is a Mark-of-the-Web Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows attackers to bypass the Mark-of-the-Web protection mechanism on affected installations of Bandizip. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of archived files. When extracting files from a crafted archive that bears the Mark-of-the-Web, Bandizip does not propagate the Mark-of-the-Web to the extracted files. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. | |||||
| CVE-2025-33028 | 2025-04-15 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
| In WinZip through 29.0, there is a Mark-of-the-Web Bypass Vulnerability because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2024-8811. This vulnerability allows attackers to bypass the Mark-of-the-Web protection mechanism on affected installations of WinZip. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of archived files. When extracting files from a crafted archive that bears the Mark-of-the-Web, WinZip does not propagate the Mark-of-the-Web to the extracted files. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. | |||||
| CVE-2024-29944 | 2 Debian, Mozilla | 2 Debian Linux, Firefox | 2025-04-01 | N/A | 8.4 HIGH |
| An attacker was able to inject an event handler into a privileged object that would allow arbitrary JavaScript execution in the parent process. Note: This vulnerability affects Desktop Firefox only, it does not affect mobile versions of Firefox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 124.0.1 and Firefox ESR < 115.9.1. | |||||
| CVE-2024-35180 | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
| OMERO.web provides a web based client and plugin infrastructure. There is currently no escaping or validation of the `callback` parameter that can be passed to various OMERO.web endpoints that have JSONP enabled. This vulnerability has been patched in version 5.26.0. | |||||
| CVE-2023-2588 | 1 Teltonika | 1 Remote Management System | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Teltonika’s Remote Management System versions prior to 4.10.0 have a feature allowing users to access managed devices’ local secure shell (SSH)/web management services over the cloud proxy. A user can request a web proxy and obtain a URL in the Remote Management System cloud subdomain. This URL could be shared with others without Remote Management System authentication . An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to create a malicious webpage that uses a trusted and certified domain. An attacker could initiate a reverse shell when a victim connects to the malicious webpage, achieving remote code execution on the victim device. | |||||
| CVE-2021-28162 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Theia | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| In Eclipse Theia versions up to and including 0.16.0, in the notification messages there is no HTML escaping, so Javascript code can run. | |||||
| CVE-2024-42381 | 2024-08-01 | N/A | 8.3 HIGH | ||
| os/linux/elf.rb in Homebrew brew before 4.2.20 uses ldd to load ELF files obtained from untrusted sources, which allows attackers to achieve code execution via an ELF file with a custom .interp section. NOTE: this code execution would occur during an un-sandboxed binary relocation phase, which occurs before a user would expect execution of downloaded package content. (237d1e783f7ee261beaba7d3f6bde22da7148b0a was the tested vulnerable version.) | |||||