Total
12074 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2021-42279 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Windows 10, Windows 11, Windows Server 2016 and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.1 MEDIUM | 4.2 MEDIUM |
Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability | |||||
CVE-2021-42272 | 2 Adobe, Microsoft | 2 Animate, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
Adobe Animate version 21.0.9 (and earlier) are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious GIF file. | |||||
CVE-2021-42271 | 1 Adobe | 1 Animate | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
Adobe Animate version 21.0.9 (and earlier) are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious BMP file. | |||||
CVE-2021-42270 | 1 Adobe | 1 Animate | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
Adobe Animate version 21.0.9 (and earlier) are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious BMP file. | |||||
CVE-2021-42204 | 1 Swftools | 1 Swftools | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
An issue was discovered in swftools through 20201222. A heap-buffer-overflow exists in the function swf_GetBits() located in rfxswf.c. It allows an attacker to cause code execution. | |||||
CVE-2021-42201 | 1 Swftools | 1 Swftools | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
An issue was discovered in swftools through 20201222. A heap-buffer-overflow exists in the function swf_GetD64() located in rfxswf.c. It allows an attacker to cause code execution. | |||||
CVE-2021-42199 | 1 Swftools | 1 Swftools | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
An issue was discovered in swftools through 20201222. A heap buffer overflow exists in the function swf_FontExtract_DefineTextCallback() located in swftext.c. It allows an attacker to cause code execution. | |||||
CVE-2021-42195 | 1 Swftools | 1 Swftools | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
An issue was discovered in swftools through 20201222. A heap-buffer-overflow exists in the function handleEditText() located in swfdump.c. It allows an attacker to cause code Execution. | |||||
CVE-2021-42076 | 1 Barrier Project | 1 Barrier | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
An issue was discovered in Barrier before 2.3.4. An attacker can cause memory exhaustion in the barriers component (aka the server-side implementation of Barrier) and barrierc by sending long TCP messages. | |||||
CVE-2021-42069 | 1 Sap | 1 3d Visual Enterprise Viewer | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.3 LOW |
When a user opens manipulated Tagged Image File Format (.tif) file received from untrusted sources in SAP 3D Visual Enterprise Viewer - version 9.0, the application crashes and becomes temporarily unavailable to the user until restart of the application | |||||
CVE-2021-42059 | 2 Insyde, Siemens | 29 Insydeh2o, Simatic Field Pg M5, Simatic Field Pg M5 Firmware and 26 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 6.7 MEDIUM |
An issue was discovered in Insyde InsydeH2O Kernel 5.0 before 05.08.41, Kernel 5.1 before 05.16.41, Kernel 5.2 before 05.26.41, Kernel 5.3 before 05.35.41, and Kernel 5.4 before 05.42.20. A stack-based buffer overflow leads toarbitrary code execution in UEFI DisplayTypeDxe DXE driver. | |||||
CVE-2021-42028 | 1 Siemens-healthineers | 1 Syngo Fastview | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
A vulnerability has been identified in syngo fastView (All versions). The affected application lacks proper validation of user-supplied data when parsing BMP files. This could result in an out-of-bounds write past the end of an allocated structure. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. (ZDI-CAN-14860) | |||||
CVE-2021-42024 | 1 Siemens | 1 Simcenter Star-ccm\+ Viewer | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
A vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter STAR-CCM+ Viewer (All versions < 2021.3.1). The starview+.exe application lacks proper validation of user-supplied data when parsing scene files. This could result in an out of bounds write past the end of an allocated structure. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. | |||||
CVE-2021-42018 | 1 Siemens | 54 Ruggedcom I800, Ruggedcom I801, Ruggedcom I802 and 51 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 5.9 MEDIUM |
A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM i800, RUGGEDCOM i800NC, RUGGEDCOM i801, RUGGEDCOM i801NC, RUGGEDCOM i802, RUGGEDCOM i802NC, RUGGEDCOM i803, RUGGEDCOM i803NC, RUGGEDCOM M2100, RUGGEDCOM M2100F, RUGGEDCOM M2100NC, RUGGEDCOM M2200, RUGGEDCOM M2200F, RUGGEDCOM M2200NC, RUGGEDCOM M969, RUGGEDCOM M969F, RUGGEDCOM M969NC, RUGGEDCOM RMC30, RUGGEDCOM RMC30NC, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RP110, RUGGEDCOM RP110NC, RUGGEDCOM RS1600, RUGGEDCOM RS1600F, RUGGEDCOM RS1600FNC, RUGGEDCOM RS1600NC, RUGGEDCOM RS1600T, RUGGEDCOM RS1600TNC, RUGGEDCOM RS400, RUGGEDCOM RS400F, RUGGEDCOM RS400NC, RUGGEDCOM RS401, RUGGEDCOM RS401NC, RUGGEDCOM RS416, RUGGEDCOM RS416F, RUGGEDCOM RS416NC, RUGGEDCOM RS416NCv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416NCv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416P, RUGGEDCOM RS416PF, RUGGEDCOM RS416PNC, RUGGEDCOM RS416PNCv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416PNCv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS8000, RUGGEDCOM RS8000A, RUGGEDCOM RS8000ANC, RUGGEDCOM RS8000H, RUGGEDCOM RS8000HNC, RUGGEDCOM RS8000NC, RUGGEDCOM RS8000T, RUGGEDCOM RS8000TNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900F, RUGGEDCOM RS900G, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GF, RUGGEDCOM RS900GNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900GNC(32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GNC(32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GP, RUGGEDCOM RS900GPF, RUGGEDCOM RS900GPNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900L, RUGGEDCOM RS900LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-GETS-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-GETS-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-STND-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-STND-XX-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900NC, RUGGEDCOM RS900NC(32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900NC(32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900W, RUGGEDCOM RS910, RUGGEDCOM RS910L, RUGGEDCOM RS910LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS910NC, RUGGEDCOM RS910W, RUGGEDCOM RS920L, RUGGEDCOM RS920LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS920W, RUGGEDCOM RS930L, RUGGEDCOM RS930LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS930W, RUGGEDCOM RS940G, RUGGEDCOM RS940GF, RUGGEDCOM RS940GNC, RUGGEDCOM RS969, RUGGEDCOM RS969NC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC(32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC(32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PF, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200NC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PF, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PNC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PNC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG907R, RUGGEDCOM RSG908C, RUGGEDCOM RSG909R, RUGGEDCOM RSG910C, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920PNC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920PNC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSL910, RUGGEDCOM RSL910NC, RUGGEDCOM RST2228, RUGGEDCOM RST2228P, RUGGEDCOM RST916C, RUGGEDCOM RST916P. Within a third-party component, whenever memory allocation is requested, the out of bound size is not checked. Therefore, if size exceeding the expected allocation is assigned, it could allocate a smaller buffer instead. If an attacker were to exploit this, they could cause a heap overflow. | |||||
CVE-2021-42012 | 1 Trendmicro | 3 Apex One, Worry-free Business Security, Worry-free Business Security Services | 2024-11-21 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex One, Apex One as a Service and Worry-Free Business Security 10.0 SP1 could allow a local attacker to escalate privileges on affected installations. Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. | |||||
CVE-2021-42008 | 3 Debian, Linux, Netapp | 20 Debian Linux, Linux Kernel, H300e and 17 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
The decode_data function in drivers/net/hamradio/6pack.c in the Linux kernel before 5.13.13 has a slab out-of-bounds write. Input from a process that has the CAP_NET_ADMIN capability can lead to root access. | |||||
CVE-2021-41987 | 1 Mikrotik | 1 Routeros | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
In the SCEP Server of RouterOS in certain Mikrotik products, an attacker can trigger a heap-based buffer overflow that leads to remote code execution. The attacker must know the scep_server_name value. This affects RouterOS 6.46.8, 6.47.9, and 6.47.10. | |||||
CVE-2021-41736 | 1 Grame | 1 Faust | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
Faust v2.35.0 was discovered to contain a heap-buffer overflow in the function realPropagate() at propagate.cpp. | |||||
CVE-2021-41683 | 1 Jerryscript | 1 Jerryscript | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
There is a stack-overflow at ecma-helpers.c:326 in ecma_get_lex_env_type in JerryScript 2.4.0 | |||||
CVE-2021-41459 | 1 Gpac | 1 Mp4box | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
There is a stack buffer overflow in MP4Box v1.0.1 at src/filters/dmx_nhml.c:1008 in the nhmldmx_send_sample() function szXmlFrom parameter which leads to a denial of service vulnerability. |