Total
331 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-1003030 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Pipeline\, Openshift Container Platform | 2025-10-24 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Jenkins Pipeline: Groovy Plugin 2.63 and earlier in pom.xml, src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/workflow/cps/CpsGroovyShell.java that allows attackers able to control pipeline scripts to execute arbitrary code on the Jenkins master JVM. | |||||
| CVE-2013-2465 | 3 Oracle, Sun, Suse | 6 Jre, Jre, Linux Enterprise Desktop and 3 more | 2025-10-22 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 21 and earlier, 6 Update 45 and earlier, and 5.0 Update 45 and earlier, and OpenJDK 7, allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to 2D. NOTE: the previous information is from the June 2013 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from another vendor that this issue allows remote attackers to bypass the Java sandbox via vectors related to "Incorrect image channel verification" in 2D. | |||||
| CVE-2013-0431 | 1 Oracle | 2 Jre, Openjdk | 2025-10-22 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 through Update 11, and OpenJDK 7, allows user-assisted remote attackers to bypass the Java security sandbox via unspecified vectors related to JMX, aka "Issue 52," a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-1490. | |||||
| CVE-2025-0411 | 1 7-zip | 1 7-zip | 2025-10-21 | N/A | 7.0 HIGH |
| 7-Zip Mark-of-the-Web Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass the Mark-of-the-Web protection mechanism on affected installations of 7-Zip. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of archived files. When extracting files from a crafted archive that bears the Mark-of-the-Web, 7-Zip does not propagate the Mark-of-the-Web to the extracted files. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. Was ZDI-CAN-25456. | |||||
| CVE-2024-38226 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Office, Publisher | 2025-10-21 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH |
| Microsoft Publisher Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2024-38217 | 1 Microsoft | 15 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 12 more | 2025-10-21 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Windows Mark of the Web Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2024-38213 | 1 Microsoft | 13 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 10 more | 2025-10-21 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Windows Mark of the Web Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2024-29988 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 22h2 and 6 more | 2025-10-21 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| SmartScreen Prompt Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2024-21412 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 22h2 and 6 more | 2025-10-21 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| Internet Shortcut Files Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2025-0277 | 1 Hcltech | 2 Bigfix Mobile, Bigfix Modern Client Management | 2025-10-21 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| HCL BigFix Mobile 3.3 and earlier are vulnerable to certain insecure directives within the Content Security Policy (CSP). An attacker could trick users into performing actions by not properly restricting the sources of scripts and other content. | |||||
| CVE-2025-0276 | 1 Hcltech | 2 Bigfix Mobile, Bigfix Modern Client Management | 2025-10-21 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| HCL BigFix Modern Client Management (MCM) 3.3 and earlier are vulnerable to certain insecure directives within the Content Security Policy (CSP). An attacker could trick users into performing actions by not properly restricting the sources of scripts and other content. | |||||
| CVE-2025-43296 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2025-10-20 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A logic issue was addressed with improved validation. This issue is fixed in macOS Tahoe 26. An app may bypass Gatekeeper checks. | |||||
| CVE-2025-52615 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Unica | 2025-10-20 | N/A | 3.5 LOW |
| HCL Unica Platform is impacted by misconfigured security related HTTP headers. This can lead to less secure browser default treatment for the policies controlled by these headers. | |||||
| CVE-2025-59033 | 2025-10-17 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH | ||
| The Microsoft vulnerable driver block list is implemented as Windows Defender Application Control (WDAC) policy. On systems that do not have hypervisor-protected code integrity (HVCI) enabled, entries that specify only the to-be-signed (TBS) part of the code signer certificate are properly blocked, but entries that specify the signing certificate’s TBS hash along with a 'FileAttribRef' qualifier (such as file name or version) will not be blocked. This vulnerability affects any Windows system that does not have HVCI enabled or supported (HVCI is available in Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server 2016 and later). NOTE: The vendor states that the driver blocklist is intended for use with HVCI, while systems without HVCI should use App Control, and any custom blocklist entries require a granular approach for proper enforcement. | |||||
| CVE-2025-50897 | 1 Boom-core | 1 Boomv | 2025-10-17 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability exists in riscv-boom SonicBOOM 1.2 (BOOMv1.2) processor implementation, where valid virtual-to-physical address translations configured with write permissions (PTE_W) in SV39 mode may incorrectly trigger a Store/AMO access fault during store instructions (sd). This occurs despite the presence of proper page table entries and valid memory access modes. The fault is reproducible when transitioning into virtual memory and attempting store operations in mapped kernel memory, indicating a potential flaw in the MMU, PMP, or memory access enforcement logic. This may cause unexpected kernel panics or denial of service in systems using BOOMv1.2. | |||||
| CVE-2024-34144 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Script Security | 2025-10-10 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A sandbox bypass vulnerability involving crafted constructor bodies in Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1335.vf07d9ce377a_e and earlier allows attackers with permission to define and run sandboxed scripts, including Pipelines, to bypass the sandbox protection and execute arbitrary code in the context of the Jenkins controller JVM. | |||||
| CVE-2025-10157 | 1 Mmaitre314 | 1 Picklescan | 2025-10-02 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A Protection Mechanism Failure vulnerability in mmaitre314 picklescan versions up to and including 0.0.30 allows a remote attacker to bypass the unsafe globals check. This is possible because the scanner performs an exact match for module names, allowing malicious payloads to be loaded via submodules of dangerous packages (e.g., 'asyncio.unix_events' instead of 'asyncio'). When the incorrectly considered safe file is loaded after scan, it can lead to the execution of malicious code. | |||||
| CVE-2025-54917 | 1 Microsoft | 15 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 12 more | 2025-10-02 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Protection mechanism failure in Windows MapUrlToZone allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network. | |||||
| CVE-2025-43273 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2025-10-02 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| A permissions issue was addressed with additional sandbox restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Sonoma 14.8. A sandboxed process may be able to circumvent sandbox restrictions. | |||||
| CVE-2024-56326 | 1 Palletsprojects | 1 Jinja | 2025-09-22 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Prior to 3.1.5, An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.5. | |||||