Total
501 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-16557 | 1 Siemens | 8 Simatic S7-400, Simatic S7-400 Firmware, Simatic S7-400 Pn\/dp V7 and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 HIGH | 8.2 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC S7-400 CPU 412-1 DP V7 (All versions), SIMATIC S7-400 CPU 412-2 DP V7 (All versions), SIMATIC S7-400 CPU 414-2 DP V7 (All versions), SIMATIC S7-400 CPU 414-3 DP V7 (All versions), SIMATIC S7-400 CPU 414-3 PN/DP V7 (All versions < V7.0.3), SIMATIC S7-400 CPU 414F-3 PN/DP V7 (All versions < V7.0.3), SIMATIC S7-400 CPU 416-2 DP V7 (All versions), SIMATIC S7-400 CPU 416-3 DP V7 (All versions), SIMATIC S7-400 CPU 416-3 PN/DP V7 (All versions < V7.0.3), SIMATIC S7-400 CPU 416F-2 DP V7 (All versions), SIMATIC S7-400 CPU 416F-3 PN/DP V7 (All versions < V7.0.3), SIMATIC S7-400 CPU 417-4 DP V7 (All versions), SIMATIC S7-400 CPU 412-2 PN V7 (All versions < V7.0.3), SIMATIC S7-400 H V4.5 and below CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions), SIMATIC S7-400 H V6 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions < V6.0.9), SIMATIC S7-400 PN/DP V6 and below CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions), SIMATIC S7-410 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions < V8.2.1), SIPLUS S7-400 CPU 414-3 PN/DP V7 (All versions < V7.0.3), SIPLUS S7-400 CPU 416-3 PN/DP V7 (All versions < V7.0.3), SIPLUS S7-400 CPU 416-3 V7 (All versions), SIPLUS S7-400 CPU 417-4 V7 (All versions). Sending of specially crafted packets to port 102/tcp via Ethernet interface via PROFIBUS or Multi Point Interfaces (MPI) could cause a denial of service condition on affected devices. Flashing with a firmware image may be required to recover the CPU. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to have network access to port 102/tcp via Ethernet interface or to be able to send messages via PROFIBUS or Multi Point Interfaces (MPI) to the device. No user interaction is required. If no access protection is configured, no privileges are required to exploit the security vulnerability. The vulnerability could allow causing a denial of service condition of the core functionality of the CPU, compromising the availability of the system. | |||||
| CVE-2018-16515 | 2 Debian, Matrix | 2 Debian Linux, Synapse | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Matrix Synapse before 0.33.3.1 allows remote attackers to spoof events and possibly have unspecified other impacts by leveraging improper transaction and event signature validation. | |||||
| CVE-2018-16253 | 1 Axtls Project | 1 Axtls | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| In sig_verify() in x509.c in axTLS version 2.1.3 and before, the PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification does not properly verify the ASN.1 metadata. Consequently, a remote attacker can forge signatures when small public exponents are being used, which could lead to impersonation through fake X.509 certificates. This is an even more permissive variant of CVE-2006-4790 and CVE-2014-1568. | |||||
| CVE-2018-16152 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Strongswan | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Strongswan | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In verify_emsa_pkcs1_signature() in gmp_rsa_public_key.c in the gmp plugin in strongSwan 4.x and 5.x before 5.7.0, the RSA implementation based on GMP does not reject excess data in the digestAlgorithm.parameters field during PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification. Consequently, a remote attacker can forge signatures when small public exponents are being used, which could lead to impersonation when only an RSA signature is used for IKEv2 authentication. This is a variant of CVE-2006-4790 and CVE-2014-1568. | |||||
| CVE-2018-16151 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Strongswan | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Strongswan | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In verify_emsa_pkcs1_signature() in gmp_rsa_public_key.c in the gmp plugin in strongSwan 4.x and 5.x before 5.7.0, the RSA implementation based on GMP does not reject excess data after the encoded algorithm OID during PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification. Similar to the flaw in the same version of strongSwan regarding digestAlgorithm.parameters, a remote attacker can forge signatures when small public exponents are being used, which could lead to impersonation when only an RSA signature is used for IKEv2 authentication. | |||||
| CVE-2018-16150 | 1 Axtls Project | 1 Axtls | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| In sig_verify() in x509.c in axTLS version 2.1.3 and before, the PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification does not reject excess data after the hash value. Consequently, a remote attacker can forge signatures when small public exponents are being used, which could lead to impersonation through fake X.509 certificates. This is a variant of CVE-2006-4340. | |||||
| CVE-2018-16149 | 1 Axtls Project | 1 Axtls | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| In sig_verify() in x509.c in axTLS version 2.1.3 and before, the PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification blindly trusts the declared lengths in the ASN.1 structure. Consequently, when small public exponents are being used, a remote attacker can generate purposefully crafted signatures (and put them on X.509 certificates) to induce illegal memory access and crash the verifier. | |||||
| CVE-2018-16042 | 5 Adobe, Apple, Iskysoft and 2 more | 8 Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc, Reader and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.008.20081 and earlier, 2019.008.20080 and earlier, 2019.008.20081 and earlier, 2017.011.30106 and earlier version, 2017.011.30105 and earlier version, 2015.006.30457 and earlier, and 2015.006.30456 and earlier have a security bypass vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to information disclosure. | |||||
| CVE-2018-15836 | 1 Xelerance | 1 Openswan | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In verify_signed_hash() in lib/liboswkeys/signatures.c in Openswan before 2.6.50.1, the RSA implementation does not verify the value of padding string during PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification. Consequently, a remote attacker can forge signatures when small public exponents are being used. IKEv2 signature verification is affected when RAW RSA keys are used. | |||||
| CVE-2018-15587 | 2 Debian, Gnome | 2 Debian Linux, Evolution | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| GNOME Evolution through 3.28.2 is prone to OpenPGP signatures being spoofed for arbitrary messages using a specially crafted email that contains a valid signature from the entity to be impersonated as an attachment. | |||||
| CVE-2018-15586 | 1 Enigmail | 1 Enigmail | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Enigmail before 2.0.6 is prone to to OpenPGP signatures being spoofed for arbitrary messages using a PGP/INLINE signature wrapped within a specially crafted multipart HTML email. | |||||
| CVE-2018-15374 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios Xe | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the Image Verification feature of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to install a malicious software image or file on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to the affected software improperly verifying digital signatures for software images and files that are uploaded to a device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by uploading a malicious software image or file to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass digital signature verification checks for software images and files and install a malicious software image or file on the affected device. | |||||
| CVE-2018-12556 | 1 Yarnpkg | 1 Website | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The signature verification routine in install.sh in yarnpkg/website through 2018-06-05 only verifies that the yarn release is signed by any (arbitrary) key in the local keyring of the user, and does not pin the signature to the yarn release key, which allows remote attackers to sign tampered yarn release packages with their own key. | |||||
| CVE-2018-12356 | 1 Simple Password Store Project | 1 Simple Password Store | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in password-store.sh in pass in Simple Password Store 1.7.x before 1.7.2. The signature verification routine parses the output of GnuPG with an incomplete regular expression, which allows remote attackers to spoof file signatures on configuration files and extension scripts. Modifying the configuration file allows the attacker to inject additional encryption keys under their control, thereby disclosing passwords to the attacker. Modifying the extension scripts allows the attacker arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2018-12019 | 1 Enigmail | 1 Enigmail | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The signature verification routine in Enigmail before 2.0.7 interprets user ids as status/control messages and does not correctly keep track of the status of multiple signatures, which allows remote attackers to spoof arbitrary email signatures via public keys containing crafted primary user ids. | |||||
| CVE-2018-10988 | 1 Diqee | 2 Diqee360, Diqee360 Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered on Diqee Diqee360 devices. A firmware update process, integrated into the firmware, starts at boot and tries to find the update folder on the microSD card. It executes code, without a digital signature, as root from the /mnt/sdcard/$PRO_NAME/upgrade.sh or /sdcard/upgrage_360/upgrade.sh pathname. | |||||
| CVE-2018-10470 | 2 Apple, Objective Development | 2 Macos, Little Snitch | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Little Snitch versions 4.0 to 4.0.6 use the SecStaticCodeCheckValidityWithErrors() function without the kSecCSCheckAllArchitectures flag and therefore do not validate all architectures stored in a fat binary. An attacker can maliciously craft a fat binary containing multiple architectures that may cause a situation where Little Snitch treats the running process as having no code signature at all while erroneously indicating that the binary on disk does have a valid code signature. This could lead to users being confused about whether or not the code signature is valid. | |||||
| CVE-2018-10407 | 1 Carbonblack | 1 Carbon Black Cb | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Carbon Black Cb Response. A maliciously crafted Universal/fat binary can evade third-party code signing checks. By not completing full inspection of the Universal/fat binary, the user of the third-party tool will believe that the code is signed by Apple, but the malicious unsigned code will execute. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1000539 | 1 Json-jwt Project | 1 Json-jwt | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Nov json-jwt version >= 0.5.0 && < 1.9.4 contains a CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability in Decryption of AES-GCM encrypted JSON Web Tokens that can result in Attacker can forge a authentication tag. This attack appear to be exploitable via network connectivity. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 1.9.4 and later. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1000076 | 2 Debian, Rubygems | 2 Debian Linux, Rubygems | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| RubyGems version Ruby 2.2 series: 2.2.9 and earlier, Ruby 2.3 series: 2.3.6 and earlier, Ruby 2.4 series: 2.4.3 and earlier, Ruby 2.5 series: 2.5.0 and earlier, prior to trunk revision 62422 contains a Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability in package.rb that can result in a mis-signed gem could be installed, as the tarball would contain multiple gem signatures.. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 2.7.6. | |||||