Total
2490 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-4610 | 1 Clickstudios | 1 Passwordstate | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 1.9 LOW |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Click Studios Passwordstate and Passwordstate Browser Extension Chrome. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to risky cryptographic algorithm. Local access is required to approach this attack. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-216272. | |||||
| CVE-2022-45453 | 3 Acronis, Linux, Microsoft | 3 Cyber Protect, Linux Kernel, Windows | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| TLS/SSL weak cipher suites enabled. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect 15 (Windows, Linux) before build 30984. | |||||
| CVE-2022-40675 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortinac, Fortinac-f | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Some cryptographic issues in Fortinet FortiNAC versions 9.4.0 through 9.4.1, 9.2.0 through 9.2.7, 9.1.0 through 9.1.8, 8.8.0 through 8.8.11, 8.7.0 through 8.7.6, 8.6.0 through 8.6.5, 8.5.0 through 8.5.4, 8.3.7 may allow an attacker to decrypt and forge protocol communication messages. | |||||
| CVE-2022-32222 | 2 Nodejs, Siemens | 2 Node.js, Sinec Ins | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A cryptographic vulnerability exists on Node.js on linux in versions of 18.x prior to 18.40.0 which allowed a default path for openssl.cnf that might be accessible under some circumstances to a non-admin user instead of /etc/ssl as was the case in versions prior to the upgrade to OpenSSL 3. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23724 | 1 Pingidentity | 1 Pingid Integration For Windows Login | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 6.4 MEDIUM |
| Use of static encryption key material allows forging an authentication token to other users within a tenant organization. MFA may be bypassed by redirecting an authentication flow to a target user. To exploit the vulnerability, must have compromised user credentials. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23719 | 1 Pingidentity | 1 Pingid Integration For Windows Login | 2024-11-21 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| PingID Windows Login prior to 2.8 does not authenticate communication with a local Java service used to capture security key requests. An attacker with the ability to execute code on the target machine maybe able to exploit and spoof the local Java service using multiple attack vectors. A successful attack can lead to code executed as SYSTEM by the PingID Windows Login application, or even a denial of service for offline security key authentication. | |||||
| CVE-2022-22076 | 1 Qualcomm | 696 315 5g Iot Modem, 315 5g Iot Modem Firmware, 8953pro and 693 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| information disclosure due to cryptographic issue in Core during RPMB read request. | |||||
| CVE-2021-4258 | 1 Whohas Project | 1 Whohas | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 3.7 LOW |
| A vulnerability was found in whohas. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component Package Information Handler. The manipulation leads to cleartext transmission of sensitive information. The attack may be initiated remotely. The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment. The name of the patch is 667c3e2e9178f15c23d7918b5db25cd0792c8472. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-216251. NOTE: Most sources redirect to the encrypted site which limits the possibilities of an attack. | |||||
| CVE-2021-42001 | 1 Pingidentity | 1 Pingid Desktop | 2024-11-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 8.0 HIGH |
| PingID Desktop prior to 1.7.3 has a misconfiguration in the encryption libraries which can lead to sensitive data exposure. An attacker capable of exploiting this vulnerability may be able to successfully complete an MFA challenge via OTP. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41995 | 2 Apple, Pingidentity | 2 Macos, Pingid Integration For Mac Login | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.7 HIGH |
| A misconfiguration of RSA in PingID Mac Login prior to 1.1 is vulnerable to pre-computed dictionary attacks, leading to an offline MFA bypass. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41994 | 1 Pingidentity | 2 Pingid, Pingid Windows Login | 2024-11-21 | 1.9 LOW | 6.6 MEDIUM |
| A misconfiguration of RSA in PingID iOS app prior to 1.19 is vulnerable to pre-computed dictionary attacks, leading to an offline MFA bypass when using PingID Windows Login. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41993 | 1 Pingidentity | 2 Pingid, Pingid Windows Login | 2024-11-21 | 1.9 LOW | 6.6 MEDIUM |
| A misconfiguration of RSA in PingID Android app prior to 1.19 is vulnerable to pre-computed dictionary attacks, leading to an offline MFA bypass when using PingID Windows Login. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41992 | 1 Pingidentity | 1 Pingid Integration For Windows Login | 2024-11-21 | 1.9 LOW | 7.7 HIGH |
| A misconfiguration of RSA in PingID Windows Login prior to 2.7 is vulnerable to pre-computed dictionary attacks, leading to an offline MFA bypass. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22947 | 8 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 5 more | 34 Macos, Debian Linux, Fedora and 31 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| When curl >= 7.20.0 and <= 7.78.0 connects to an IMAP or POP3 server to retrieve data using STARTTLS to upgrade to TLS security, the server can respond and send back multiple responses at once that curl caches. curl would then upgrade to TLS but not flush the in-queue of cached responses but instead continue using and trustingthe responses it got *before* the TLS handshake as if they were authenticated.Using this flaw, it allows a Man-In-The-Middle attacker to first inject the fake responses, then pass-through the TLS traffic from the legitimate server and trick curl into sending data back to the user thinking the attacker's injected data comes from the TLS-protected server. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8897 | 1 Amazon | 1 Aws Encryption Sdk | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| A weak robustness vulnerability exists in the AWS Encryption SDKs for Java, Python, C and Javalcript prior to versions 2.0.0. Due to the non-committing property of AES-GCM (and other AEAD ciphers such as AES-GCM-SIV or (X)ChaCha20Poly1305) used by the SDKs to encrypt messages, an attacker can craft a unique cyphertext which will decrypt to multiple different results, and becomes especially relevant in a multi-recipient setting. We recommend users update their SDK to 2.0.0 or later. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8173 | 1 Nextcloud | 1 Nextcloud Server | 2024-11-21 | 3.5 LOW | 2.2 LOW |
| A too small set of random characters being used for encryption in Nextcloud Server 18.0.4 allowed decryption in shorter time than intended. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8150 | 1 Nextcloud | 1 Nextcloud Server | 2024-11-21 | 1.9 LOW | 4.1 MEDIUM |
| A cryptographic issue in Nextcloud Server 19.0.1 allowed an attacker to downgrade the encryption scheme and break the integrity of encrypted files. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3389 | 1 Cisco | 1 Hyperflex Hx-series Software | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the installation component of Cisco Hyperflex HX-Series Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to retrieve the password that was configured at installation on an affected device. The vulnerability exists because sensitive information is stored as clear text. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by authenticating to an affected device and navigating to the directory that contains sensitive information. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain sensitive information in clear text from the affected device. | |||||
| CVE-2019-9861 | 1 Abus | 2 Secvest Wireless Alarm System Fuaa50000, Secvest Wireless Alarm System Fuaa50000 Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 4.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Due to the use of an insecure RFID technology (MIFARE Classic), ABUS proximity chip keys (RFID tokens) of the ABUS Secvest FUAA50000 wireless alarm system can easily be cloned and used to deactivate the alarm system in an unauthorized way. | |||||
| CVE-2019-9506 | 8 Apple, Blackberry, Canonical and 5 more | 274 Iphone Os, Mac Os X, Tvos and 271 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| The Bluetooth BR/EDR specification up to and including version 5.1 permits sufficiently low encryption key length and does not prevent an attacker from influencing the key length negotiation. This allows practical brute-force attacks (aka "KNOB") that can decrypt traffic and inject arbitrary ciphertext without the victim noticing. | |||||