Total
1114 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-1683 | 1 Cisco | 28 Spa112, Spa112 Firmware, Spa500 and 25 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the certificate handling component of the Cisco SPA112, SPA525, and SPA5X5 Series IP Phones could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to listen to or control some aspects of a Transport Level Security (TLS)-encrypted Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) conversation. The vulnerability is due to the improper validation of server certificates. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting a malicious server certificate to present to the client. An exploit could allow an attacker to eavesdrop on TLS-encrypted traffic and potentially route or redirect calls initiated by an affected device. Affected software include version 7.6.2 of the Cisco Small Business SPA525 Series IP Phones and Cisco Small Business SPA5X5 Series IP Phones and version 1.4.2 of the Cisco Small Business SPA500 Series IP Phones and Cisco Small Business SPA112 Series IP Phones. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1659 | 1 Cisco | 1 Prime Infrastructure | 2024-11-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the Identity Services Engine (ISE) integration feature of Cisco Prime Infrastructure (PI) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack against the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) tunnel established between ISE and PI. The vulnerability is due to improper validation of the server SSL certificate when establishing the SSL tunnel with ISE. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using a crafted SSL certificate and could then intercept communications between the ISE and PI. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to view and alter potentially sensitive information that the ISE maintains about clients that are connected to the network. This vulnerability affects Cisco Prime Infrastructure Software Releases 2.2 through 3.4.0 when the PI server is integrated with ISE, which is disabled by default. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1590 | 1 Cisco | 28 Nexus 9000, Nexus 92160yc-x, Nexus 92300yc and 25 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the Transport Layer Security (TLS) certificate validation functionality of Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Application Centric Infrastructure (ACI) Mode Switch Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to perform insecure TLS client authentication on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient TLS client certificate validations for certificates sent between the various components of an ACI fabric. An attacker who has possession of a certificate that is trusted by the Cisco Manufacturing CA and the corresponding private key could exploit this vulnerability by presenting a valid certificate while attempting to connect to the targeted device. An exploit could allow the attacker to gain full control of all other components within the ACI fabric of an affected device. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1552 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2024-11-21 | 1.9 LOW | 3.3 LOW |
| OpenSSL has internal defaults for a directory tree where it can find a configuration file as well as certificates used for verification in TLS. This directory is most commonly referred to as OPENSSLDIR, and is configurable with the --prefix / --openssldir configuration options. For OpenSSL versions 1.1.0 and 1.1.1, the mingw configuration targets assume that resulting programs and libraries are installed in a Unix-like environment and the default prefix for program installation as well as for OPENSSLDIR should be '/usr/local'. However, mingw programs are Windows programs, and as such, find themselves looking at sub-directories of 'C:/usr/local', which may be world writable, which enables untrusted users to modify OpenSSL's default configuration, insert CA certificates, modify (or even replace) existing engine modules, etc. For OpenSSL 1.0.2, '/usr/local/ssl' is used as default for OPENSSLDIR on all Unix and Windows targets, including Visual C builds. However, some build instructions for the diverse Windows targets on 1.0.2 encourage you to specify your own --prefix. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1, 1.1.0 and 1.0.2 are affected by this issue. Due to the limited scope of affected deployments this has been assessed as low severity and therefore we are not creating new releases at this time. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0l (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2t (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2s). | |||||
| CVE-2019-1231 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Project Rome | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the way Rome SDK handles server SSL/TLS certificate validation, aka 'Rome SDK Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1006 | 1 Microsoft | 13 .net Framework, Identitymodel, Sharepoint Enterprise Server and 10 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) and Windows Identity Foundation (WIF), allowing signing of SAML tokens with arbitrary symmetric keys, aka 'WCF/WIF SAML Token Authentication Bypass Vulnerability'. | |||||
| CVE-2019-19271 | 1 Proftpd | 1 Proftpd | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in tls_verify_crl in ProFTPD before 1.3.6. A wrong iteration variable, used when checking a client certificate against CRL entries (installed by a system administrator), can cause some CRL entries to be ignored, and can allow clients whose certificates have been revoked to proceed with a connection to the server. | |||||
| CVE-2019-19270 | 2 Fedoraproject, Proftpd | 2 Fedora, Proftpd | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in tls_verify_crl in ProFTPD through 1.3.6b. Failure to check for the appropriate field of a CRL entry (checking twice for subject, rather than once for subject and once for issuer) prevents some valid CRLs from being taken into account, and can allow clients whose certificates have been revoked to proceed with a connection to the server. | |||||
| CVE-2019-19101 | 1 Br-automation | 1 Automation Studio | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A missing secure communication definition and an incomplete TLS validation in the upgrade service in B&R Automation Studio versions 4.0.x, 4.1.x, 4.2.x, < 4.3.11SP, < 4.4.9SP, < 4.5.5SP, < 4.6.4 and < 4.7.2 enable unauthenticated users to perform MITM attacks via the B&R upgrade server. | |||||
| CVE-2019-18847 | 1 Akamai | 1 Enterprise Application Access | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Enterprise Access Client Auto-Updater allows for Remote Code Execution prior to version 2.0.1. | |||||
| CVE-2019-18826 | 1 Barco | 8 Clickshare Cs-100, Clickshare Cs-100 Firmware, Clickshare Cse-200 and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Barco ClickShare Button R9861500D01 devices before 1.9.0 have Improper Following of a Certificate's Chain of Trust. The embedded 'dongle_bridge' program used to expose the functionalities of the ClickShare Button to a USB host, does not properly validate the whole certificate chain. | |||||
| CVE-2019-18633 | 1 Europa | 1 Eidas-node Integration Package | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| European Commission eIDAS-Node Integration Package before 2.3.1 has Missing Certificate Validation because a certain ExplicitKeyTrustEvaluator return value is not checked. NOTE: only 2.1 is confirmed to be affected. | |||||
| CVE-2019-18632 | 1 Europa | 1 Eidas-node Integration Package | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| European Commission eIDAS-Node Integration Package before 2.3.1 allows Certificate Faking because an attacker can sign a manipulated SAML response with a forged certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2019-17560 | 2 Apache, Oracle | 2 Netbeans, Graalvm | 2024-11-21 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| The "Apache NetBeans" autoupdate system does not validate SSL certificates and hostnames for https based downloads. This allows an attacker to intercept downloads of autoupdates and modify the download, potentially injecting malicious code. “Apache NetBeans" versions up to and including 11.2 are affected by this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2019-17007 | 2 Mozilla, Siemens | 17 Network Security Services, Ruggedcom Rox Mx5000, Ruggedcom Rox Mx5000 Firmware and 14 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In Network Security Services before 3.44, a malformed Netscape Certificate Sequence can cause NSS to crash, resulting in a denial of service. | |||||
| CVE-2019-16561 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Websphere Deployer | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 7.1 HIGH |
| Jenkins WebSphere Deployer Plugin 1.6.1 and earlier allows users with Overall/Read access to disable SSL/TLS certificate and hostname validation for the entire Jenkins master JVM. | |||||
| CVE-2019-16558 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Spira Importer | 2024-11-21 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 8.2 HIGH |
| Jenkins Spira Importer Plugin 3.2.3 and earlier disables SSL/TLS certificate validation for the Jenkins master JVM. | |||||
| CVE-2019-16281 | 1 Ptarmigan Project | 1 Ptarmigan | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Ptarmigan before 0.2.3 lacks API token validation, e.g., an "if (token === apiToken) {return true;} return false;" code block. | |||||
| CVE-2019-16263 | 1 Twitter | 1 Twitter Kit | 2024-11-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| The Twitter Kit framework through 3.4.2 for iOS does not properly validate the api.twitter.com SSL certificate. Although the certificate chain must contain one of a set of pinned certificates, there are certain implementation errors such as a lack of hostname verification. NOTE: this is an end-of-life product. | |||||
| CVE-2019-16252 | 1 Nutfind | 1 Nutfind | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Missing SSL Certificate Validation in the Nutfind.com application through 3.9.12 for Android allows a man-in-the-middle attacker to sniff and manipulate all API requests, including login credentials and location data. | |||||