Total
1157 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-3342 | 1 Cisco | 1 Webex Meetings | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the software update feature of Cisco Webex Meetings Desktop App for Mac could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to improper validation of cryptographic protections on files that are downloaded by the application as part of a software update. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to go to a website that returns files to the client that are similar to files that are returned from a valid Webex website. The client may fail to properly validate the cryptographic protections of the provided files before executing them as part of an update. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the affected system with the privileges of the user. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3155 | 1 Cisco | 11 Intelligence Proximity, Jabber, Meeting and 8 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the SSL implementation of the Cisco Intelligent Proximity solution could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to view or alter information shared on Cisco Webex video devices and Cisco collaboration endpoints if the products meet the conditions described in the Vulnerable Products section. The vulnerability is due to a lack of validation of the SSL server certificate received when establishing a connection to a Cisco Webex video device or a Cisco collaboration endpoint. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using man in the middle (MITM) techniques to intercept the traffic between the affected client and an endpoint, and then using a forged certificate to impersonate the endpoint. Depending on the configuration of the endpoint, an exploit could allow the attacker to view presentation content shared on it, modify any content being presented by the victim, or have access to call controls. This vulnerability does not affect cloud registered collaboration endpoints. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36478 | 3 Arm, Debian, Siemens | 14 Mbed Tls, Debian Linux, Logo\! Cmr2020 and 11 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS before 2.25.0 (and before 2.16.9 LTS and before 2.7.18 LTS). A NULL algorithm parameters entry looks identical to an array of REAL (size zero) and thus the certificate is considered valid. However, if the parameters do not match in any way, then the certificate should be considered invalid. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36477 | 1 Arm | 1 Mbed Tls | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS before 2.24.0. The verification of X.509 certificates when matching the expected common name (the cn argument of mbedtls_x509_crt_verify) with the actual certificate name is mishandled: when the subjecAltName extension is present, the expected name is compared to any name in that extension regardless of its type. This means that an attacker could impersonate a 4-byte or 16-byte domain by getting a certificate for the corresponding IPv4 or IPv6 address (this would require the attacker to control that IP address, though). | |||||
| CVE-2020-36425 | 2 Arm, Debian | 2 Mbed Tls, Debian Linux | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Arm Mbed TLS before 2.24.0. It incorrectly uses a revocationDate check when deciding whether to honor certificate revocation via a CRL. In some situations, an attacker can exploit this by changing the local clock. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36127 | 1 Paxtechnology | 1 Paxstore | 2024-11-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Pax Technology PAXSTORE v7.0.8_20200511171508 and lower is affected by an information disclosure vulnerability. Through the PUK signature functionality, an administrator will not have access to the current p12 certificate and password. When accessing this functionality, the administrator has the option to replace the current certificate and it is not possible to view the certificate password (p12) already deployed on the platform. The replacement p12 certificate returns to users in base64 with its password, which can be accessed by non-administrator users. | |||||
| CVE-2020-35733 | 2 Erlang, Fedoraproject | 2 Erlang\/otp, Fedora | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Erlang/OTP before 23.2.2. The ssl application 10.2 accepts and trusts an invalid X.509 certificate chain to a trusted root Certification Authority. | |||||
| CVE-2020-35662 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Saltstack | 3 Debian Linux, Fedora, Salt | 2024-11-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| In SaltStack Salt before 3002.5, when authenticating to services using certain modules, the SSL certificate is not always validated. | |||||
| CVE-2020-2253 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Email Extension | 2024-11-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| Jenkins Email Extension Plugin 2.75 and earlier does not perform hostname validation when connecting to the configured SMTP server. | |||||
| CVE-2020-2252 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Mailer | 2024-11-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| Jenkins Mailer Plugin 1.32 and earlier does not perform hostname validation when connecting to the configured SMTP server. | |||||
| CVE-2020-2187 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Amazon Ec2 | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 5.6 MEDIUM |
| Jenkins Amazon EC2 Plugin 1.50.1 and earlier unconditionally accepts self-signed certificates and does not perform hostname validation, enabling man-in-the-middle attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2020-2033 | 1 Paloaltonetworks | 1 Globalprotect | 2024-11-21 | 2.9 LOW | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| When the pre-logon feature is enabled, a missing certification validation in Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect app can disclose the pre-logon authentication cookie to a man-in-the-middle attacker on the same local area network segment with the ability to manipulate ARP or to conduct ARP spoofing attacks. This allows the attacker to access the GlobalProtect Server as allowed by configured Security rules for the 'pre-login' user. This access may be limited compared to the network access of regular users. This issue affects: GlobalProtect app 5.0 versions earlier than GlobalProtect app 5.0.10 when the prelogon feature is enabled; GlobalProtect app 5.1 versions earlier than GlobalProtect app 5.1.4 when the prelogon feature is enabled. | |||||
| CVE-2020-29663 | 1 Icinga | 1 Icinga | 2024-11-21 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Icinga 2 v2.8.0 through v2.11.7 and v2.12.2 has an issue where revoked certificates due for renewal will automatically be renewed, ignoring the CRL. This issue is fixed in Icinga 2 v2.11.8 and v2.12.3. | |||||
| CVE-2020-29504 | 1 Dell | 2 Bsafe Crypto-c-micro-edition, Bsafe Micro-edition-suite | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH |
| Dell BSAFE Crypto-C Micro Edition, versions before 4.1.5, and Dell BSAFE Micro Edition Suite, versions before 4.5.2, contain a Missing Required Cryptographic Step Vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2020-29457 | 1 Opcfoundation | 1 Ua-.netstandard | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| A Privilege Elevation vulnerability in OPC UA .NET Standard Stack 1.4.363.107 could allow a rogue application to establish a secure connection. | |||||
| CVE-2020-29440 | 1 Tesla | 2 Model X, Model X Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 4.6 MEDIUM |
| Tesla Model X vehicles before 2020-11-23 do not perform certificate validation during an attempt to pair a new key fob with the body control module (BCM). This allows an attacker (who is inside a vehicle, or is otherwise able to send data over the CAN bus) to start and drive the vehicle with a spoofed key fob. | |||||
| CVE-2020-28972 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Saltstack | 3 Debian Linux, Fedora, Salt | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| In SaltStack Salt before 3002.5, authentication to VMware vcenter, vsphere, and esxi servers (in the vmware.py files) does not always validate the SSL/TLS certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2020-28942 | 1 Primekey | 1 Ejbca | 2024-11-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| An issue exists in PrimeKey EJBCA before 7.4.3 when enrolling with EST while proxied through an RA over the Peers protocol. As a part of EJBCA's domain security model, the peer connector allows the restriction of client certificates (for the RA, not the end user) to a limited set of allowed CAs, thus restricting the accessibility of that RA to the rights it has within a specific role. While this works for other protocols such as CMP, it was found that the EJBCA enrollment over an EST implementation bypasses this check, allowing enrollment with a valid client certificate through any functioning and authenticated RA connected to the CA. NOTE: an attacker must already have a trusted client certificate and authorization to enroll against the targeted CA. | |||||
| CVE-2020-28907 | 1 Nagios | 1 Fusion | 2024-11-21 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Incorrect SSL certificate validation in Nagios Fusion 4.1.8 and earlier allows for Escalation of Privileges or Code Execution as root via vectors related to download of an untrusted update package in upgrade_to_latest.sh. | |||||
| CVE-2020-28362 | 3 Fedoraproject, Golang, Netapp | 4 Fedora, Go, Cloud Insights Telegraf Agent and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Go before 1.14.12 and 1.15.x before 1.15.4 allows Denial of Service. | |||||