Total
1114 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-5901 | 1 State Bank Of India | 1 State Bank Anywhere | 2025-04-20 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The State Bank of India State Bank Anywhere app 5.1.0 for iOS does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2017-9598 | 1 Meafinancial | 1 Morton Credit Union Mobile Banking | 2025-04-20 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The "Morton Credit Union Mobile Banking" by Morton Credit Union app 3.0.1 -- aka morton-credit-union-mobile-banking/id1119623070 for iOS does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2014-3250 | 3 Apache, Puppet, Redhat | 3 Http Server, Puppet, Linux | 2025-04-20 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The default vhost configuration file in Puppet before 3.6.2 does not include the SSLCARevocationCheck directive, which might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a revoked certificate when a Puppet master runs with Apache 2.4. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4832 | 1 Aeon | 1 Waon | 2025-04-20 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| WAON "Service Application" for Android 1.4.1 and earlier does not verify SSL certificates. | |||||
| CVE-2017-9585 | 1 Csb-lamar | 1 Community State Bank-lamar | 2025-04-20 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The "Community State Bank - Lamar Mobile Banking" by Community State Bank - Lamar app 3.0.3 -- aka community-state-bank-lamar-mobile-banking/id1083927885 for iOS does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26478 | 2025-04-17 | N/A | 3.1 LOW | ||
| Dell ECS version 3.8.1.4 and prior contain an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with adjacent network access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure. | |||||
| CVE-2022-32531 | 1 Apache | 1 Bookkeeper | 2025-04-17 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The Apache Bookkeeper Java Client (before 4.14.6 and also 4.15.0) does not close the connection to the bookkeeper server when TLS hostname verification fails. This leaves the bookkeeper client vulnerable to a man in the middle attack. The problem affects BookKeeper client prior to versions 4.14.6 and 4.15.1. | |||||
| CVE-2022-22747 | 1 Mozilla | 3 Firefox, Firefox Esr, Thunderbird | 2025-04-16 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| After accepting an untrusted certificate, handling an empty pkcs7 sequence as part of the certificate data could have lead to a crash. This crash is believed to be unexploitable. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 91.5, Firefox < 96, and Thunderbird < 91.5. | |||||
| CVE-2022-1834 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Thunderbird | 2025-04-16 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| When displaying the sender of an email, and the sender name contained the Braille Pattern Blank space character multiple times, Thunderbird would have displayed all the spaces. This could have been used by an attacker to send an email message with the attacker's digital signature, that was shown with an arbitrary sender email address chosen by the attacker. If the sender name started with a false email address, followed by many Braille space characters, the attacker's email address was not visible. Because Thunderbird compared the invisible sender address with the signature's email address, if the signing key or certificate was accepted by Thunderbird, the email was shown as having a valid digital signature. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird < 91.10. | |||||
| CVE-2022-1197 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Thunderbird | 2025-04-16 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| When importing a revoked key that specified key compromise as the revocation reason, Thunderbird did not update the existing copy of the key that was not yet revoked, and the existing key was kept as non-revoked. Revocation statements that used another revocation reason, or that didn't specify a revocation reason, were unaffected. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird < 91.8. | |||||
| CVE-2024-42193 | 2025-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| HCL BigFix Web Reports' service communicates over HTTPS but exhibits a weakness in its handling of SSL certificate validation. This scenario presents a possibility of man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks and data exposure as, if exploited, this vulnerability could potentially lead to unauthorized access. | |||||
| CVE-2022-34469 | 2 Google, Mozilla | 2 Android, Firefox | 2025-04-15 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| When a TLS Certificate error occurs on a domain protected by the HSTS header, the browser should not allow the user to bypass the certificate error. On Firefox for Android, the user was presented with the option to bypass the error; this could only have been done by the user explicitly. <br>*This bug only affects Firefox for Android. Other operating systems are unaffected.*. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 102. | |||||
| CVE-2022-45419 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Firefox | 2025-04-15 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| If the user added a security exception for an invalid TLS certificate, opened an ongoing TLS connection with a server that used that certificate, and then deleted the exception, Firefox would have kept the connection alive, making it seem like the certificate was still trusted. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 107. | |||||
| CVE-2022-45197 | 1 Slixmpp Project | 1 Slixmpp | 2025-04-14 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Slixmpp before 1.8.3 lacks SSL Certificate hostname validation in XMLStream, allowing an attacker to pose as any server in the eyes of Slixmpp. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3152 | 6 Debian, Fedoraproject, Mariadb and 3 more | 12 Debian Linux, Fedora, Mariadb and 9 more | 2025-04-12 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Oracle MySQL before 5.7.3, Oracle MySQL Connector/C (aka libmysqlclient) before 6.1.3, and MariaDB before 5.5.44 use the --ssl option to mean that SSL is optional, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers via a cleartext-downgrade attack, aka a "BACKRONYM" attack. | |||||
| CVE-2016-7171 | 1 Netapp | 1 Netapp Plug-in | 2025-04-12 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 5.6 MEDIUM |
| NetApp Plug-in for Symantec NetBackup prior to version 2.0.1 makes use of a non-unique server certificate, making it vulnerable to impersonation. | |||||
| CVE-2015-8960 | 7 Apple, Google, Ietf and 4 more | 18 Safari, Chrome, Transport Layer Security and 15 more | 2025-04-12 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier supports the rsa_fixed_dh, dss_fixed_dh, rsa_fixed_ecdh, and ecdsa_fixed_ecdh values for ClientCertificateType but does not directly document the ability to compute the master secret in certain situations with a client secret key and server public key but not a server secret key, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS servers by leveraging knowledge of the secret key for an arbitrary installed client X.509 certificate, aka the "Key Compromise Impersonation (KCI)" issue. | |||||
| CVE-2015-4094 | 1 Thycotic | 1 Secret Server | 2025-04-12 | 5.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The Thycotic Password Manager Secret Server application through 2.3 for iOS does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0534 | 1 Dell | 3 Bsafe, Bsafe Ssl-c, Bsafe Ssl-j | 2025-04-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| EMC RSA BSAFE Micro Edition Suite (MES) 4.0.x before 4.0.8 and 4.1.x before 4.1.3, RSA BSAFE Crypto-J before 6.2, RSA BSAFE SSL-J before 6.2, and RSA BSAFE SSL-C 2.8.9 and earlier do not enforce certain constraints on certificate data, which allows remote attackers to defeat a fingerprint-based certificate-blacklist protection mechanism by including crafted data within a certificate's unsigned portion, a similar issue to CVE-2014-8275. | |||||
| CVE-2014-3394 | 1 Cisco | 11 Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Adaptive Security Virtual Appliance, Asa 1000v Cloud Firewall and 8 more | 2025-04-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The Smart Call Home (SCH) implementation in Cisco ASA Software 8.2 before 8.2(5.50), 8.4 before 8.4(7.15), 8.6 before 8.6(1.14), 8.7 before 8.7(1.13), 9.0 before 9.0(4.8), and 9.1 before 9.1(5.1) allows remote attackers to bypass certificate validation via an arbitrary VeriSign certificate, aka Bug ID CSCun10916. | |||||