Total
648 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-14359 | 1 Real-sec | 2 Bc Vault, Bc Vault Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 2.4 LOW |
| On BC Vault devices, a side channel for the row-based SSD1309 OLED display was found. The power consumption of each row-based display cycle depends on the number of illuminated pixels, allowing a partial recovery of display contents. For example, a hardware implant in the USB cable might be able to leverage this behavior to recover a data value. In other words, the side channel is relevant only if the attacker has enough control over the device's USB connection to make power-consumption measurements at a time when secret data is displayed. The side channel is not relevant in other circumstances, such as a stolen device that is not currently displaying secret data. NOTE: the vendor's position is that there is no security impact: the only potentially leaked information is the number of characters in the PIN | |||||
| CVE-2019-14358 | 1 Archos | 1 Safe-t | 2024-11-21 | 1.9 LOW | 4.6 MEDIUM |
| On Archos Safe-T devices, a side channel for the row-based OLED display was found. The power consumption of each row-based display cycle depends on the number of illuminated pixels, allowing a partial recovery of display contents. For example, a hardware implant in the USB cable might be able to leverage this behavior to recover confidential secrets such as the PIN and BIP39 mnemonic. In other words, the side channel is relevant only if the attacker has enough control over the device's USB connection to make power-consumption measurements at a time when secret data is displayed. The side channel is not relevant in other circumstances, such as a stolen device that is not currently displaying secret data. | |||||
| CVE-2019-14357 | 1 Mooltipass | 2 Mooltipass Mini, Mooltipass Mini Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 1.9 LOW | 2.4 LOW |
| On Mooltipass Mini devices, a side channel for the row-based OLED display was found. The power consumption of each row-based display cycle depends on the number of illuminated pixels, allowing a partial recovery of display contents. For example, a hardware implant in the USB cable might be able to leverage this behavior to recover confidential secrets such as the PIN. In other words, the side channel is relevant only if the attacker has enough control over the device's USB connection to make power-consumption measurements at a time when secret data is displayed. The side channel is not relevant in other circumstances, such as a stolen device that is not currently displaying secret data. NOTE: the vendor's position is that an attack is not "realistically implementable. | |||||
| CVE-2019-14356 | 1 Coinkite | 4 Coldcard Mk1, Coldcard Mk1 Firmware, Coldcard Mk2 and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| On Coldcard MK1 and MK2 devices, a side channel for the row-based OLED display was found. The power consumption of each row-based display cycle depends on the number of illuminated pixels, allowing a partial recovery of display contents. For example, a hardware implant in the USB cable might be able to leverage this behavior to recover confidential secrets such as the PIN and BIP39 mnemonic. In other words, the side channel is relevant only if the attacker has enough control over the device's USB connection to make power-consumption measurements at a time when secret data is displayed. The side channel is not relevant in other circumstances, such as a stolen device that is not currently displaying secret data. On Coldcard MK1 and MK2 devices, a side channel for the row-based OLED display was found. The power consumption of each row-based display cycle depends on the number of illuminated pixels, allowing a partial recovery of display contents. For example, a hardware implant in the USB cable might be able to leverage this behavior to recover confidential secrets such as the PIN and BIP39 mnemonic. In other words, the side channel is relevant only if the attacker has enough control over the device's USB connection to make power-consumption measurements at a time when secret data is displayed. The side channel is not relevant in other circumstances, such as a stolen device that is not currently displaying secret data. NOTE: At Coinkite, we’ve already mitigated it, even though we feel strongly that it is not a legitimate issue. In our opinion, it is both unproven (might not even work) and also completely impractical—even if it could be made to work perfectly | |||||
| CVE-2019-14355 | 1 Shapeshift | 2 Keepkey, Keepkey Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 1.9 LOW | 2.4 LOW |
| On ShapeShift KeepKey devices, a side channel for the row-based OLED display was found. The power consumption of each row-based display cycle depends on the number of illuminated pixels, allowing a partial recovery of display contents. For example, a hardware implant in the USB cable might be able to leverage this behavior to recover secret data shown on the display. In other words, the side channel is relevant only if the attacker has enough control over the device's USB connection to make power-consumption measurements at a time when secret data is displayed. The side channel is not relevant in other circumstances, such as a stolen device that is not currently displaying secret data. NOTE: the vendor's position is that there is "insignificant risk. | |||||
| CVE-2019-14354 | 1 Ledger | 4 Nano S, Nano S Firmware, Nano X and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 1.9 LOW | 2.4 LOW |
| On Ledger Nano S and Nano X devices, a side channel for the row-based OLED display was found. The power consumption of each row-based display cycle depends on the number of illuminated pixels, allowing a partial recovery of display contents. For example, a hardware implant in the USB cable might be able to leverage this behavior to recover confidential secrets such as the PIN and BIP39 mnemonic. In other words, the side channel is relevant only if the attacker has enough control over the device's USB connection to make power-consumption measurements at a time when secret data is displayed. The side channel is not relevant in other circumstances, such as a stolen device that is not currently displaying secret data. | |||||
| CVE-2019-14353 | 1 Trezor | 2 One, One Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 1.9 LOW | 4.2 MEDIUM |
| On Trezor One devices before 1.8.2, a side channel for the row-based OLED display was found. The power consumption of each row-based display cycle depends on the number of illuminated pixels, allowing a partial recovery of display contents. For example, a hardware implant in the USB cable might be able to leverage this behavior to recover confidential secrets such as the PIN and BIP39 mnemonic. In other words, the side channel is relevant only if the attacker has enough control over the device's USB connection to make power-consumption measurements at a time when secret data is displayed. The side channel is not relevant in other circumstances, such as a stolen device that is not currently displaying secret data. NOTE: this CVE applies exclusively to the Trezor One, and does not refer to any issues with OLED displays on other devices. | |||||
| CVE-2019-14067 | 1 Qualcomm | 108 Apq8009, Apq8009 Firmware, Apq8017 and 105 more | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Using non-time-constant functions like memcmp to compare sensitive data can lead to information leakage through timing side channel issue. in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon IoT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking in APQ8009, APQ8017, APQ8053, APQ8096, APQ8096AU, APQ8098, Kamorta, MDM9150, MDM9205, MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9650, MSM8909, MSM8909W, MSM8917, MSM8920, MSM8937, MSM8940, MSM8953, MSM8996, MSM8996AU, MSM8998, Nicobar, QCM2150, QCS404, QCS405, QCS605, QM215, Rennell, SA415M, SA6155P, SC7180, SC8180X, SDA660, SDA845, SDM429, SDM429W, SDM439, SDM450, SDM630, SDM632, SDM636, SDM660, SDM670, SDM710, SDM845, SDM850, SDX24, SDX55, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SXR1130, SXR2130 | |||||
| CVE-2019-14007 | 1 Qualcomm | 98 Apq8009, Apq8009 Firmware, Apq8017 and 95 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.9 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Due to the use of non-time-constant comparison functions there is issue in timing side channels which can be used as a potential side channel for SUI corruption in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking in APQ8009, APQ8017, APQ8053, APQ8096, APQ8096AU, APQ8098, MDM9150, MDM9205, MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9650, MSM8905, MSM8909, MSM8917, MSM8920, MSM8937, MSM8940, MSM8953, MSM8996, MSM8996AU, MSM8998, Nicobar, QCS404, QCS405, QCS605, QM215, Rennell, SA6155P, SC7180, SDA660, SDA845, SDM429, SDM439, SDM450, SDM630, SDM632, SDM636, SDM660, SDM670, SDM710, SDM845, SDM850, SDX24, SDX55, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SXR1130, SXR2130 | |||||
| CVE-2019-13684 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2024-11-21 | 2.6 LOW | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Inappropriate implementation in JavaScript in Google Chrome prior to 72.0.3626.81 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13666 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| Information leak in storage in Google Chrome prior to 77.0.3865.75 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13629 | 1 Matrixssl | 1 Matrixssl | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| MatrixSSL 4.2.1 and earlier contains a timing side channel in ECDSA signature generation. This allows a local or a remote attacker, able to measure the duration of hundreds to thousands of signing operations, to compute the private key used. The issue occurs because crypto/pubkey/ecc_math.c scalar multiplication leaks the bit length of the scalar. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13628 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | 1.2 LOW | 4.7 MEDIUM |
| wolfSSL and wolfCrypt 4.0.0 and earlier (when configured without --enable-fpecc, --enable-sp, or --enable-sp-math) contain a timing side channel in ECDSA signature generation. This allows a local attacker, able to precisely measure the duration of signature operations, to infer information about the nonces used and potentially mount a lattice attack to recover the private key used. The issue occurs because ecc.c scalar multiplication might leak the bit length. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13627 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Libgcrypt20 Project and 1 more | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Libgcrypt20 and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 2.6 LOW | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| It was discovered that there was a ECDSA timing attack in the libgcrypt20 cryptographic library. Version affected: 1.8.4-5, 1.7.6-2+deb9u3, and 1.6.3-2+deb8u4. Versions fixed: 1.8.5-2 and 1.6.3-2+deb8u7. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13599 | 1 Control-webpanel | 1 Webpanel | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In CentOS-WebPanel.com (aka CWP) CentOS Web Panel 0.9.8.848, the Login process allows attackers to check whether a username is valid by comparing response times. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13456 | 4 Freeradius, Linux, Opensuse and 1 more | 4 Freeradius, Linux Kernel, Leap and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 2.9 LOW | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In FreeRADIUS 3.0 through 3.0.19, on average 1 in every 2048 EAP-pwd handshakes fails because the password element cannot be found within 10 iterations of the hunting and pecking loop. This leaks information that an attacker can use to recover the password of any user. This information leakage is similar to the "Dragonblood" attack and CVE-2019-9494. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13420 | 1 Search-guard | 1 Search Guard | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Search Guard versions before 21.0 had an timing side channel issue when using the internal user database. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13383 | 1 Control-webpanel | 1 Webpanel | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In CentOS-WebPanel.com (aka CWP) CentOS Web Panel 0.9.8.846, the Login process allows attackers to check whether a username is valid by reading the HTTP response. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13377 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 1 more | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The implementations of SAE and EAP-pwd in hostapd and wpa_supplicant 2.x through 2.8 are vulnerable to side-channel attacks as a result of observable timing differences and cache access patterns when Brainpool curves are used. An attacker may be able to gain leaked information from a side-channel attack that can be used for full password recovery. | |||||
| CVE-2019-12953 | 1 Dropbear Ssh Project | 1 Dropbear Ssh | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Dropbear 2011.54 through 2018.76 has an inconsistent failure delay that may lead to revealing valid usernames, a different issue than CVE-2018-15599. | |||||