Total
9049 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-20507 | 1 Cisco | 1 Meeting Management | 2025-07-23 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the logging subsystem of Cisco Meeting Management could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to view sensitive information in clear text on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to improper storage of sensitive information within the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by logging in to the web-based management interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to view sensitive data that is stored on the affected device. | |||||
| CVE-2022-20630 | 1 Cisco | 1 Catalyst Center | 2025-07-23 | 2.1 LOW | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the audit log of Cisco DNA Center could allow an authenticated, local attacker to view sensitive information in clear text. This vulnerability is due to the unsecured logging of sensitive information on an affected system. An attacker with administrative privileges could exploit this vulnerability by accessing the audit logs through the CLI. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to retrieve sensitive information that includes user credentials. | |||||
| CVE-2023-20055 | 1 Cisco | 1 Catalyst Center | 2025-07-23 | N/A | 8.0 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the management API of Cisco DNA Center could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to elevate privileges in the context of the web-based management interface on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to the unintended exposure of sensitive information. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by inspecting the responses from the API. Under certain circumstances, a successful exploit could allow the attacker to access the API with the privileges of a higher-level user account. To successfully exploit this vulnerability, the attacker would need at least valid Observer credentials. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3411 | 1 Cisco | 1 Catalyst Center | 2025-07-23 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in Cisco DNA Center software could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker access to sensitive information on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to improper handling of authentication tokens by the affected software. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker access to sensitive device information, which includes configuration files. | |||||
| CVE-2025-8039 | 2025-07-23 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH | ||
| In some cases search terms persisted in the URL bar even after navigating away from the search page. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 141, Firefox ESR < 140.1, Thunderbird < 141, and Thunderbird < 140.1. | |||||
| CVE-2024-52966 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortianalyzer | 2025-07-22 | N/A | 2.3 LOW |
| An exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 6.4.0 through 7.6.0 allows attacker to cause information disclosure via filter manipulation. | |||||
| CVE-2023-40723 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortisiem | 2025-07-22 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| An exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor in Fortinet FortiSIEM version 6.7.0 through 6.7.4 and 6.6.0 through 6.6.3 and 6.5.0 through 6.5.1 and 6.4.0 through 6.4.2 and 6.3.0 through 6.3.3 and 6.2.0 through 6.2.1 and 6.1.0 through 6.1.2 and 5.4.0 and 5.3.0 through 5.3.3 and 5.2.5 through 5.2.8 and 5.2.1 through 5.2.2 and 5.1.0 through 5.1.3 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via api request. | |||||
| CVE-2025-25250 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortios, Fortisase | 2025-07-22 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| An Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability [CWE-200] in FortiOS version 7.6.0, version 7.4.7 and below, 7.2 all versions, 7.0 all versions, 6.4 all versions SSL-VPN web-mode may allow an authenticated user to access full SSL-VPN settings via crafted URL. | |||||
| CVE-2025-53640 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Indico is an event management system that uses Flask-Multipass, a multi-backend authentication system for Flask. Starting in version 2.2 and prior to version 3.3.7, an endpoint used to display details of users listed in certain fields (such as ACLs) could be misused to dump basic user details (such as name, affiliation and email) in bulk. Version 3.3.7 fixes the issue. Owners of instances that allow everyone to create a user account, who wish to truly restrict access to these user details, should consider restricting user search to managers. As a workaround, it is possible to restrict access to the affected endpoints (e.g. in the webserver config), but doing so would break certain form fields which could no longer show the details of the users listed in those fields, so upgrading instead is highly recommended. | |||||
| CVE-2025-52372 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | 5.1 MEDIUM | ||
| An issue in hMailServer v.5.8.6 allows a local attacker to obtain sensitive information via the hmailserver/installation/hMailServerInnoExtension.iss and hMailServer.ini components. | |||||
| CVE-2025-50708 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| An issue in Perplexity AI GPT-4 v.2.51.0 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the token component in the shared chat URL | |||||
| CVE-2025-7394 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| In the OpenSSL compatibility layer implementation, the function RAND_poll() was not behaving as expected and leading to the potential for predictable values returned from RAND_bytes() after fork() is called. This can lead to weak or predictable random numbers generated in applications that are both using RAND_bytes() and doing fork() operations. This only affects applications explicitly calling RAND_bytes() after fork() and does not affect any internal TLS operations. Although RAND_bytes() documentation in OpenSSL calls out not being safe for use with fork() without first calling RAND_poll(), an additional code change was also made in wolfSSL to make RAND_bytes() behave similar to OpenSSL after a fork() call without calling RAND_poll(). Now the Hash-DRBG used gets reseeded after detecting running in a new process. If making use of RAND_bytes() and calling fork() we recommend updating to the latest version of wolfSSL. Thanks to Per Allansson from Appgate for the report. | |||||
| CVE-2025-7874 | 2025-07-22 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM | ||
| A vulnerability was found in Metasoft 美特软件 MetaCRM up to 6.4.2. It has been rated as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /env.jsp. The manipulation leads to information disclosure. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | |||||
| CVE-2025-46382 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM | ||
| CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor | |||||
| CVE-2025-7919 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM | ||
| WinMatrix3 Web package developed by Simopro Technology has a SQL Injection vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands to read, modify, and delete database contents. | |||||
| CVE-2025-6082 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The Birth Chart Compatibility plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 2.0. This is due to insufficient protection against directly accessing the plugin's index.php file, which causes an error exposing the full path. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the full path of the web application, which can be used to aid other attacks. The information displayed is not useful on its own, and requires another vulnerability to be present for damage to an affected website. | |||||
| CVE-2025-20226 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk, Splunk Cloud Platform | 2025-07-21 | N/A | 5.7 MEDIUM |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.4.1, 9.3.3, 9.2.5, and 9.1.8 and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 9.3.2408.107, 9.2.2406.111, and 9.1.2308.214, a low-privileged user that does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could run a saved search with a risky command using the permissions of a higher-privileged user to bypass the SPL safeguards for risky commands on the "/services/streams/search" endpoint through its "q" parameter. The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the victim by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The authenticated user should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will. | |||||
| CVE-2025-20232 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk, Splunk Cloud Platform | 2025-07-21 | N/A | 5.7 MEDIUM |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.3.3, 9.2.5, and 9.1.8 and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 9.3.2408.103, 9.2.2406.108, 9.2.2403.113, 9.1.2312.208 and 9.1.2308.212, a low-privileged user that does not hold the “admin“ or “power“ Splunk roles could run a saved search with a risky command using the permissions of a higher-privileged user to bypass the SPL safeguards for risky commands on the “/app/search/search“ endpoint through its “s“ parameter. <br>The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the victim by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The authenticated user should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will. | |||||
| CVE-2025-3415 | 2025-07-17 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| Grafana is an open-source platform for monitoring and observability. The Grafana Alerting DingDing integration was not properly protected and could be exposed to users with Viewer permission. Fixed in versions 10.4.19+security-01, 11.2.10+security-01, 11.3.7+security-01, 11.4.5+security-01, 11.5.5+security-01, 11.6.2+security-01 and 12.0.1+security-01 | |||||
| CVE-2025-34130 | 2025-07-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| An unauthenticated arbitrary file read exists in LILIN Digital Video Recorder (DVR) devices prior to firmware version 2.0b60_20200207 via the /z/zbin/net_html.cgi endpoint. This vulnerability allows attackers to read sensitive configuration files, such as /zconf/service.xml, which can then be used to facilitate further attacks including command injection. The vulnerability has been exploited in the wild in conjunction with other issues by botnets like FBot and Moobot. | |||||