Total
60 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-1262 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-04-20 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting attacks. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability using specially-crafted URL to cause the server to return a split response, once the URL is clicked. This would allow the attacker to perform further attacks, such as Web cache poisoning, cross-site scripting, and possibly obtain sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 124737. | |||||
| CVE-2017-7443 | 2 Apt-cacher-ng Project, Apt-cacher Project | 2 Apt-cacher-ng, Apt-cacher | 2025-04-20 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| apt-cacher before 1.7.15 and apt-cacher-ng before 3.4 allow HTTP response splitting via encoded newline characters, related to lack of blocking for the %0[ad] regular expression. | |||||
| CVE-2017-12309 | 1 Cisco | 1 Email Security Appliance Firmware | 2025-04-20 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a HTTP response splitting attack. The vulnerability is due to the failure of the application or its environment to properly sanitize input values. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious HTTP headers, controlling the response body, or splitting the response into multiple responses. An exploit could allow the attacker to perform cross-site scripting attacks, cross-user defacement, web cache poisoning, and similar exploits. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvf16705. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8024 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Virusscan Enterprise | 2025-04-20 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Improper neutralization of CRLF sequences in HTTP headers vulnerability in Intel Security VirusScan Enterprise Linux (VSEL) 2.0.3 (and earlier) allows remote unauthenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information via the server HTTP response spoofing. | |||||
| CVE-2015-1445 | 1 Fli4l | 1 Fli4l | 2025-04-20 | 9.0 HIGH | 7.2 HIGH |
| HTTP header injection in the httpd package in fli4l before 3.10.1 and 4.0 before 2015-01-30. | |||||
| CVE-2016-5325 | 2 Nodejs, Suse | 2 Node.js, Linux Enterprise | 2025-04-12 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| CRLF injection vulnerability in the ServerResponse#writeHead function in Node.js 0.10.x before 0.10.47, 0.12.x before 0.12.16, 4.x before 4.6.0, and 6.x before 6.7.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via the reason argument. | |||||
| CVE-2016-5699 | 1 Python | 1 Python | 2025-04-12 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| CRLF injection vulnerability in the HTTPConnection.putheader function in urllib2 and urllib in CPython (aka Python) before 2.7.10 and 3.x before 3.4.4 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers via CRLF sequences in a URL. | |||||
| CVE-2016-6839 | 1 Huawei | 1 Fusionaccess | 2025-04-12 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| CRLF injection vulnerability in Huawei FusionAccess before V100R006C00 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4993 | 1 Redhat | 3 Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Wildfly Application Server | 2025-04-12 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| CRLF injection vulnerability in the Undertow web server in WildFly 10.0.0, as used in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 7.x before 7.0.2, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0733 | 1 Cisco | 1 Headend Digital Broadband Delivery System | 2025-04-12 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| CRLF injection vulnerability in the HTTP Header Handler in Digital Broadband Delivery System in Cisco Headend System Release allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers, and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks or cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, via a crafted request, aka Bug ID CSCur25580. | |||||
| CVE-2007-5595 | 1 Drupal | 1 Drupal | 2025-04-09 | 5.1 MEDIUM | N/A |
| CRLF injection vulnerability in the drupal_goto function in includes/common.inc Drupal 4.7.x before 4.7.8 and 5.x before 5.3 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2022-37436 | 1 Apache | 1 Http Server | 2025-04-04 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Prior to Apache HTTP Server 2.4.55, a malicious backend can cause the response headers to be truncated early, resulting in some headers being incorporated into the response body. If the later headers have any security purpose, they will not be interpreted by the client. | |||||
| CVE-2025-30221 | 2025-03-27 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| Pitchfork is a preforking HTTP server for Rack applications. Versions prior to 0.11.0 are vulnerable to HTTP Response Header Injection when used in conjunction with Rack 3. The issue was fixed in Pitchfork release 0.11.0. No known workarounds are available. | |||||
| CVE-2025-0588 | 2025-03-13 | N/A | N/A | ||
| In affected versions of Octopus Server it was possible for a user with sufficient access to set custom headers in all server responses. By submitting a specifically crafted referrer header the user could ensure that all subsequent server responses would return 500 errors rendering the site mostly unusable. The user would be able to subsequently set and unset the referrer header to control the denial of service state with a valid CSRF token whilst new CSRF tokens could not be generated. | |||||
| CVE-2025-0825 | 2025-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| cpp-httplib version v0.17.3 through v0.18.3 fails to filter CRLF characters ("\r\n") when those are prefixed with a null byte. This enables attackers to exploit CRLF injection that could further lead to HTTP Response Splitting, XSS, and more. | |||||
| CVE-2024-54021 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortios, Fortiproxy | 2025-02-03 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| An improper neutralization of crlf sequences in http headers ('http response splitting') in Fortinet FortiOS 7.2.0 through 7.6.0, FortiProxy 7.2.0 through 7.4.5 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted HTTP header. | |||||
| CVE-2024-52875 | 2025-01-31 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH | ||
| An issue was discovered in GFI Kerio Control 9.2.5 through 9.4.5. The dest GET parameter passed to the /nonauth/addCertException.cs and /nonauth/guestConfirm.cs and /nonauth/expiration.cs pages is not properly sanitized before being used to generate a Location HTTP header in a 302 HTTP response. This can be exploited to perform Open Redirect or HTTP Response Splitting attacks, which in turn lead to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). Remote command execution can be achieved by leveraging the upgrade feature in the admin interface. | |||||
| CVE-2024-45687 | 2025-01-21 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting') vulnerability in Payara Platform Payara Server (Grizzly, REST Management Interface modules), Payara Platform Payara Micro (Grizzly modules) allows Manipulating State, Identity Spoofing.This issue affects Payara Server: from 4.1.151 through 4.1.2.191.51, from 5.20.0 through 5.70.0, from 5.2020.2 through 5.2022.5, from 6.2022.1 through 6.2024.12, from 6.0.0 through 6.21.0; Payara Micro: from 4.1.152 through 4.1.2.191.51, from 5.20.0 through 5.70.0, from 5.2020.2 through 5.2022.5, from 6.2022.1 through 6.2024.12, from 6.0.0 through 6.21.0. | |||||
| CVE-2023-0508 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2025-01-07 | N/A | 3.1 LOW |
| An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 15.4 before 15.10.8, all versions starting from 15.11 before 15.11.7, all versions starting from 16.0 before 16.0.2. Open redirection was possible via HTTP response splitting in the NPM package API. | |||||
| CVE-2024-40324 | 1 Datex-soft | 1 E-staff | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| A CRLF injection vulnerability in E-Staff v5.1 allows attackers to insert Carriage Return (CR) and Line Feed (LF) characters into input fields, leading to HTTP response splitting and header manipulation. | |||||