Vulnerabilities (CVE)

Filtered by CWE-1025
Total 6 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v2 CVSS v3
CVE-2025-32464 2025-04-23 N/A 6.8 MEDIUM
HAProxy 2.2 through 3.1.6, in certain uncommon configurations, has a sample_conv_regsub heap-based buffer overflow because of mishandling of the replacement of multiple short patterns with a longer one.
CVE-2025-2888 2025-03-28 N/A N/A
During a snapshot rollback, the client incorrectly caches the timestamp metadata. If the client checks the cache when attempting to perform the next update, the update timestamp validation will fail, preventing the next update until the cache is cleared. Users should upgrade to tough version 0.20.0 or later and ensure any forked or derivative code is patched to incorporate the new fixes.
CVE-2025-2887 2025-03-28 N/A N/A
During a target rollback, the client fails to detect the rollback for delegated targets. This could cause the client to fetch a target from an incorrect source, altering the target contents. Users should upgrade to tough version 0.20.0 or later and ensure any forked or derivative code is patched to incorporate the new fixes.
CVE-2025-25306 2025-03-10 N/A 9.3 CRITICAL
Misskey is an open source, federated social media platform. The patch for CVE-2024-52591 did not sufficiently validate the relation between the `id` and `url` fields of ActivityPub objects. An attacker can forge an object where they claim authority in the `url` field even if the specific ActivityPub object type require authority in the `id` field. Version 2025.2.1 addresses the issue.
CVE-2025-27839 2025-03-08 N/A 3.2 LOW
operations/attestation/AttestationTask.kt in the Tangem SDK before 5.18.3 for Android has a logic flow in offline wallet attestation (genuineness check) that causes verification results to be disregarded during the first scan of a card. Exploitation may not have been possible.
CVE-2024-20342 2025-01-13 N/A 5.8 MEDIUM
Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability in the rate filtering feature of the Snort detection engine that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured rate limiting filter.  This vulnerability is due to an incorrect connection count comparison. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending traffic through an affected device at a rate that exceeds a configured rate filter. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to successfully bypass the rate filter. This could allow unintended traffic to enter the network protected by the affected device.