CVE-2024-22857

{"id": "CVE-2024-22857", "cveTags": [], "metrics": {"cvssMetricV31": [{"type": "Secondary", "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "cvssData": {"scope": "UNCHANGED", "version": "3.1", "baseScore": 9.8, "attackVector": "NETWORK", "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "userInteraction": "NONE", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH"}, "impactScore": 5.9, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9}]}, "published": "2024-03-07T01:15:52.640", "references": [{"url": "https://github.com/HardySimpson/zlog/", "source": "cve@mitre.org"}, {"url": "https://github.com/HardySimpson/zlog/blob/1a7b1a6fb956b92a4079ccc91f30da21f34ca063/src/rule.h#L30", "source": "cve@mitre.org"}, {"url": "https://github.com/HardySimpson/zlog/pull/251", "source": "cve@mitre.org"}, {"url": "https://www.cybersecurity-help.cz/vdb/SB2024022842", "source": "cve@mitre.org"}, {"url": "https://www.ebryx.com/blogs/arbitrary-code-execution-in-zlog-cve-2024-22857", "source": "cve@mitre.org"}, {"url": "https://github.com/HardySimpson/zlog/", "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"}, {"url": "https://github.com/HardySimpson/zlog/blob/1a7b1a6fb956b92a4079ccc91f30da21f34ca063/src/rule.h#L30", "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"}, {"url": "https://github.com/HardySimpson/zlog/pull/251", "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"}, {"url": "https://www.cybersecurity-help.cz/vdb/SB2024022842", "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"}, {"url": "https://www.ebryx.com/blogs/arbitrary-code-execution-in-zlog-cve-2024-22857", "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"}], "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis", "weaknesses": [{"type": "Secondary", "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "description": [{"lang": "en", "value": "CWE-122"}]}], "descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "value": "Heap based buffer flow in zlog v1.1.0 to v1.2.17 in zlog_rule_new().The size of record_name is MAXLEN_PATH(1024) + 1 but file_path may have data upto MAXLEN_CFG_LINE(MAXLEN_PATH*4) + 1. So a check was missing in zlog_rule_new() while copying the record_name from file_path + 1 which caused the buffer overflow. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to overwrite the zlog_record_fn record_func function pointer to get arbitrary code execution or potentially cause remote code execution (RCE)."}, {"lang": "es", "value": "zlog 1.2.16 tiene un desbordamiento de b\u00fafer de almacenamiento din\u00e1mico en la estructura zlog_rule_s mientras crea una nueva regla que ya est\u00e1 definida en el archivo de configuraci\u00f3n proporcionado. Un usuario normal puede lograr la ejecuci\u00f3n de c\u00f3digo arbitrario."}], "lastModified": "2024-11-21T08:56:42.987", "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org"}