Search Results (206 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2022-31151 2 Nodejs, Redhat 2 Undici, Acm 2025-04-22 3.7 Low
Authorization headers are cleared on cross-origin redirect. However, cookie headers which are sensitive headers and are official headers found in the spec, remain uncleared. There are active users using cookie headers in undici. This may lead to accidental leakage of cookie to a 3rd-party site or a malicious attacker who can control the redirection target (ie. an open redirector) to leak the cookie to the 3rd party site. This was patched in v5.7.1. By default, this vulnerability is not exploitable. Do not enable redirections, i.e. `maxRedirections: 0` (the default).
CVE-2022-35949 2 Nodejs, Redhat 2 Undici, Acm 2025-04-22 5.3 Medium
undici is an HTTP/1.1 client, written from scratch for Node.js.`undici` is vulnerable to SSRF (Server-side Request Forgery) when an application takes in **user input** into the `path/pathname` option of `undici.request`. If a user specifies a URL such as `http://127.0.0.1` or `//127.0.0.1` ```js const undici = require("undici") undici.request({origin: "http://example.com", pathname: "//127.0.0.1"}) ``` Instead of processing the request as `http://example.org//127.0.0.1` (or `http://example.org/http://127.0.0.1` when `http://127.0.0.1 is used`), it actually processes the request as `http://127.0.0.1/` and sends it to `http://127.0.0.1`. If a developer passes in user input into `path` parameter of `undici.request`, it can result in an _SSRF_ as they will assume that the hostname cannot change, when in actual fact it can change because the specified path parameter is combined with the base URL. This issue was fixed in `undici@5.8.1`. The best workaround is to validate user input before passing it to the `undici.request` call.
CVE-2022-35948 2 Nodejs, Redhat 2 Undici, Acm 2025-04-22 5.3 Medium
undici is an HTTP/1.1 client, written from scratch for Node.js.`=< undici@5.8.0` users are vulnerable to _CRLF Injection_ on headers when using unsanitized input as request headers, more specifically, inside the `content-type` header. Example: ``` import { request } from 'undici' const unsanitizedContentTypeInput = 'application/json\r\n\r\nGET /foo2 HTTP/1.1' await request('http://localhost:3000, { method: 'GET', headers: { 'content-type': unsanitizedContentTypeInput }, }) ``` The above snippet will perform two requests in a single `request` API call: 1) `http://localhost:3000/` 2) `http://localhost:3000/foo2` This issue was patched in Undici v5.8.1. Sanitize input when sending content-type headers using user input as a workaround.
CVE-2017-14919 1 Nodejs 1 Node.js 2025-04-20 N/A
Node.js before 4.8.5, 6.x before 6.11.5, and 8.x before 8.8.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (uncaught exception and crash) by leveraging a change in the zlib module 1.2.9 making 8 an invalid value for the windowBits parameter.
CVE-2017-14849 1 Nodejs 1 Node.js 2025-04-20 N/A
Node.js 8.5.0 before 8.6.0 allows remote attackers to access unintended files, because a change to ".." handling was incompatible with the pathname validation used by unspecified community modules.
CVE-2013-7454 1 Nodejs 1 Node.js 2025-04-20 N/A
The validator module before 1.1.0 for Node.js allows remote attackers to bypass the cross-site scripting (XSS) filter via nested forbidden strings.
CVE-2013-7451 1 Nodejs 1 Node.js 2025-04-20 N/A
The validator module before 1.1.0 for Node.js allows remote attackers to bypass the XSS filter via a nested tag.
CVE-2013-7452 1 Nodejs 1 Node.js 2025-04-20 N/A
The validator module before 1.1.0 for Node.js allows remote attackers to bypass the cross-site scripting (XSS) filter via a crafted javascript URI.
CVE-2013-7453 1 Nodejs 1 Node.js 2025-04-20 N/A
The validator module before 1.1.0 for Node.js allows remote attackers to bypass the cross-site scripting (XSS) filter via vectors related to UI redressing.
CVE-2014-3744 1 Nodejs 1 Node.js 2025-04-20 N/A
Directory traversal vulnerability in the st module before 0.2.5 for Node.js allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a %2e%2e (encoded dot dot) in an unspecified path.
CVE-2014-9772 1 Nodejs 1 Node.js 2025-04-20 N/A
The validator package before 2.0.0 for Node.js allows remote attackers to bypass the cross-site scripting (XSS) filter via hex-encoded characters.
CVE-2015-2927 3 Debian, Nodejs, Uronode 3 Debian Linux, Node.js, Uro Node 2025-04-20 N/A
node 0.3.2 and URONode before 1.0.5r3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (bandwidth consumption).
CVE-2015-7384 1 Nodejs 1 Node.js 2025-04-20 N/A
Node.js 4.0.0, 4.1.0, and 4.1.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service.
CVE-2015-8855 1 Nodejs 1 Node.js 2025-04-20 N/A
The semver package before 4.3.2 for Node.js allows attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a long version string, aka a "regular expression denial of service (ReDoS)."
CVE-2015-8860 1 Nodejs 1 Node.js 2025-04-20 N/A
The tar package before 2.0.0 for Node.js allows remote attackers to write to arbitrary files via a symlink attack in an archive.
CVE-2016-7055 3 Nodejs, Openssl, Redhat 3 Node.js, Openssl, Jboss Core Services 2025-04-20 5.9 Medium
There is a carry propagating bug in the Broadwell-specific Montgomery multiplication procedure in OpenSSL 1.0.2 and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0c that handles input lengths divisible by, but longer than 256 bits. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA, DSA and DH private keys are impossible. This is because the subroutine in question is not used in operations with the private key itself and an input of the attacker's direct choice. Otherwise the bug can manifest itself as transient authentication and key negotiation failures or reproducible erroneous outcome of public-key operations with specially crafted input. Among EC algorithms only Brainpool P-512 curves are affected and one presumably can attack ECDH key negotiation. Impact was not analyzed in detail, because pre-requisites for attack are considered unlikely. Namely multiple clients have to choose the curve in question and the server has to share the private key among them, neither of which is default behaviour. Even then only clients that chose the curve will be affected.
CVE-2016-9840 9 Apple, Boost, Canonical and 6 more 27 Iphone Os, Mac Os X, Tvos and 24 more 2025-04-20 8.8 High
inftrees.c in zlib 1.2.8 might allow context-dependent attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging improper pointer arithmetic.
CVE-2016-9841 9 Apple, Canonical, Debian and 6 more 42 Iphone Os, Mac Os X, Tvos and 39 more 2025-04-20 9.8 Critical
inffast.c in zlib 1.2.8 might allow context-dependent attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging improper pointer arithmetic.
CVE-2016-9843 10 Apple, Canonical, Debian and 7 more 27 Iphone Os, Mac Os X, Tvos and 24 more 2025-04-20 9.8 Critical
The crc32_big function in crc32.c in zlib 1.2.8 might allow context-dependent attackers to have unspecified impact via vectors involving big-endian CRC calculation.
CVE-2017-1000381 4 C-ares, C-ares Project, Nodejs and 1 more 4 C-ares, C-ares, Node.js and 1 more 2025-04-20 7.5 High
The c-ares function `ares_parse_naptr_reply()`, which is used for parsing NAPTR responses, could be triggered to read memory outside of the given input buffer if the passed in DNS response packet was crafted in a particular way.